not_paid_by_yt

4 ms·

1.
by not_paid_by_yt 2mo ago
I suppose they don't because they want to be respected, and the LLM companies that got big think they are past needing to have respect for the people who's jobs and ways of living they want to automate. We saw that in how the lead
2.
by not_paid_by_yt 2mo ago
Not personally no, but I know people are what used to be good companies that sadly are living that life right now.
3.
by not_paid_by_yt 2mo ago
I suppose it actually is exactly that, bar not being a human being that experiences anything
4.
by not_paid_by_yt 2mo ago
They have written like that when the models were much less capable, my hypothesis is this is an example of model collapse happening ever since LLM training leaned in heavily into RL and a result of training on model output the developers ar
5.
by not_paid_by_yt 2mo ago
Probably to a degree, I have found Gemini to be the least dis-likable of the models from the big 3 on that front. I wonder if the poor English comprehension of Deepseek-v4-pro and K3 is because of alleged distillation of Claude (speaking of
6.
by not_paid_by_yt 2mo ago
I'm not sure I could really live down using something branded with Grok but it makes sense Elon Musk at least shipped user facing products in the past, not surprised his company delivered something more usable.
7.
by not_paid_by_yt 2mo ago
Working as intended, the purpose of a system is what it does.
8.
by not_paid_by_yt 2mo ago
You could probably keep the Claude slop hidden and have a fresh model generate a paraphrased response for anything human visible and keep the Claude responses as thinking.
9.
by not_paid_by_yt 2mo ago
> I'll also say that I think Claude sounds the way that it does because it, like many other LLMs, are RLHF trained largely by lowly paid gig-workers, many of them ESL speakers. if their trainers were, for example, dedicated and high
10.
by not_paid_by_yt 2mo ago
The spec your principal engineer one-shoted through Claude and didn't even proof read afterwards before dumping it on the team?
11.
by not_paid_by_yt 2mo ago
It could be, but without evidence that remains a just so story, no particular reason to think it's required or useful or even harmless to the model performance or anything other than an artifact of some early silicon valley writing sty
12.
by not_paid_by_yt 2mo ago
Would more blame this on the LLM companies, they think they are on the verge of automating all work, I don't think they care about how you feel about the writing style of the Deus Ex Machina, it's not going to get fixed because to
13.
by not_paid_by_yt 5mo ago
you're both under and over estimating this technology I think, we are further away from SWE becoming a niche job than you think, but also LLMs really are less impacted by programming language than you think, this is a very pre-2010s ap
14.
by not_paid_by_yt 5mo ago
what one has to do when corporate does not not them use GPT-5.5
15.
by not_paid_by_yt 5mo ago
it does tho is the thing, like if someone is fine with using a non-SOTA model then no, but those people are probably happy with deepseek or something cheap like that, if you feel you need to be on the absolutely frontier of commercially ava
16.
by not_paid_by_yt 6mo ago
I think the optimistic thing one can hope for is this will result in coders developing somewhat of a class consciousness but it's probably too late, if that was ever going to happen people would have refused to develop AI tools in the
17.
by not_paid_by_yt 6mo ago
tokens will stop being given away for free at some point, writing software was always a pretty simple white collar job, so it makes sense it's one of the earlier ones to be automated, but really the axis of evil has it's shot now
18.
by not_paid_by_yt 6mo ago
welcome to late capital, please enjoy the ride while people are trying to tell you that LLMs are the only future (you have no future) while SOTA models can barely do shit on their own consistently outside of carefully designed benchmarks, a
19.
by not_paid_by_yt 6mo ago
we are probably not going to keep pumping CO2 out at the rate of the worst case scenario of business because believe it or not companies are aware there is little profit to be made from dead consumers. The realistic scenarios are still pret
20.
by not_paid_by_yt 6mo ago
if the trendlines continue on atmospheric greenhouse gases we will all be dead from climate change so I really do hope the world is a little bit more complicated than trendlines just extrapolating out. Interestingly enough that might actual
21.
by not_paid_by_yt 6mo ago
and that's at the VC funded discount rate I would presume, not even true cost of those tokens without any profit.
22.
by not_paid_by_yt 6mo ago
hey just don't try to copy their LLM by distilling it, cause that's "theft", if we weren't all doomed anyways this industry would have never been allowed to exist in the first place, but I guess this is just what th
23.
by not_paid_by_yt 6mo ago
That's always what laws existed for, a law is just a formal way of saying "we will use violence against you if you do something we don't like" and that has always going to be primary written by and for the people that al
24.
by not_paid_by_yt 3y ago
why should I care about """stealing it"""? I don't have any Alphabet stock, I am not employed by Alphabet, in any case they can afford to run Youtube at a loss or just shut it down. It's kinda cute ho