Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
nostradumbasp
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
1.
▲
by
nostradumbasp
2y ago
Because you can download the models yourself and run them on your own hardware bypassing all of those concerns. Also, I would be far more worried what my government might do with my chat logs then a foreign one.
2.
▲
by
nostradumbasp
2y ago
I completely agree with you and apologize for cheapening both the nuance and complexity where I did. My personal take is this. What deepseek is offering is table scraps for the CCP's actual ambitions with what we call AI. China's
3.
▲
by
nostradumbasp
2y ago
Yea but I think the OPs point is something along the following lines. Not everything you buy from China, or every person you interact with from China is part of a clandestine CCP operation. People buy stuff everyday from Alibaba and its not
4.
▲
by
nostradumbasp
2y ago
Cute! Keep making fun things.
5.
▲
by
nostradumbasp
2y ago
They actually sell those now. Well they use "faraday fabric". So that's another solution, but your phone one your head and put a foil hat on it.
6.
▲
by
nostradumbasp
2y ago
Sounds hilarious but... https://techstory.in/trump-is-accused-of-using-ai-to-compose...
7.
▲
by
nostradumbasp
2y ago
Probably more like specialized tools to help spy on and forecast civilian activities more than anything else. Definitely with hallucinations, but that's not really important. Facts don't matter much these days...
8.
▲
by
nostradumbasp
2y ago
There's no evidence for almost any of this, and even when there is, we won't see it. Just like 95% of posts on here.
9.
▲
by
nostradumbasp
2y ago
Maybe not $10 unless they are loss-leading to dominance. Well they actually could very well do exactly that... Hm, yea, good points. I would expect at least an order or two of magnitude higher to prevent an inferno. Lets be fair though. Rep
10.
▲
by
nostradumbasp
2y ago
https://openai.com/global-affairs/introducing-chatgpt-gov/ And don't forget the billions in partnerships...
11.
▲
by
nostradumbasp
2y ago
No reason why you were downvoted. This is completely valid.
12.
▲
by
nostradumbasp
2y ago
I really doubt it. If that's the case the US GOV is in serious shit. They have a contract with OpenAI to chuck all their secret data in there... In all likelihood they just distilled. It's a start up company that is publishing all
13.
▲
by
nostradumbasp
2y ago
Fine of five hundred dollars and a personal donation to a re-election campaign required.
14.
▲
by
nostradumbasp
2y ago
More than anyone could ever count.
15.
▲
by
nostradumbasp
2y ago
It couldn't lie at scale though. The amount of effort it took to doctor someones face believably onto film in the star wars era was tremendous. Now it can be done on the terabyte per second scale in an individualized fashion. Ring came
16.
▲
by
nostradumbasp
2y ago
Mostly agree. We all know how awful swatting has been for many victims. Also personalized scams and deception at scale. I also worry about homebrew automated weaponry used for cowardly terroristic purposes and how that could imaginably be a
17.
▲
by
nostradumbasp
2y ago
It's a little different now. Someone can deepfake or even face swap videos/images/audio and send an angry mob to someones house. Or be convinced to handle matters themselves... "Pictures/videographic evidence doesn&
18.
▲
by
nostradumbasp
2y ago
They are being attacked as well. https://apnews.com/article/deepseek-ai-artificial-intelligen...
19.
▲
by
nostradumbasp
2y ago
It's definitely not looking good. Now that we have more open source models, for better and for worse, we have to worry about politically motivated amateur's and vigilantes too.
20.
▲
Startup DeepSeek says it was hit with 'large-scale malicious attacks'
(apnews.com)
5 points
by
nostradumbasp
2y ago
|
1 comments
21.
▲
by
nostradumbasp
2y ago
same. I was thinking about doing something similar at some point but this exceeds my expectations. Seriously a great job. Let us know if theres anyway to contribute.
22.
▲
by
nostradumbasp
2y ago
I think it's important to remark that this "could" help solve part of the problems associated with Generative AI. It could also, without many new laws and regulations, be used to create many new problems unique to generative
23.
▲
by
nostradumbasp
2y ago
Thanks for calming me down. I totally forgot about how nothing absolutely horrible could be done to private citizens from generative AI implemented at a tremendous scale. I am also truly super glad we have so many tech billionaires now so o
24.
▲
by
nostradumbasp
2y ago
Turn your phone off, and wrap it in 5 layers of tin foil. Or like you said leave the stupid thing at home.
25.
▲
by
nostradumbasp
2y ago
Concerning isn't even the word. Looks like those military contracts and all that government money has really heated things up for OpenAI's goals for human civilization.
26.
▲
by
nostradumbasp
2y ago
Love the thesis statement. There is a lot of hidden cost in allowing abstractions from other libraries to be exposed over your own. I'm not here to say that should never be done but the future costs really need to be balanced at the de
27.
▲
by
nostradumbasp
2y ago
I think this is the key to work-life happiness. Wishing you the best. Hopefully I am doing the same someday.
28.
▲
by
nostradumbasp
2y ago
9 times out of 10 the company sells, performs a reduction in force, or goes under before they vest. 1 time out of 1000 the company is worth something and remains operable over a 5 year period. Rules of thumb for the green engineers: - Take
29.
▲
by
nostradumbasp
2y ago
I agree Rust's scientific computing is still in it's early phases. Which is super exciting but can leave a bit of wanting for more. Also agree on the bothers of FFI across programming paradigms. I've felt them. I do still won
30.
▲
by
nostradumbasp
2y ago
Oh weird, it looks like a summarizer bot that seems to only write summaries for certain Julia programming news and post them here. I wonder if that is event allowed? It seems like this sort of thing could be widely abused to spam HN with lo
More ›