northern-lights

8 ms·

61.
by northern-lights 5y ago
Nobody will ever get documents that proves as that is confidential information. If you want anecdotal evidence, you can check Blind.
62.
by northern-lights 5y ago
> When we've all had our time with the candidate, we meet back up to discuss. And at the end, the Bar Raiser- not the HM- makes the decision. Either you haven't been part of the panel in a while or you haven't worked for A
63.
by northern-lights 5y ago
> Managers simply cannot hire people just to fire them because they do not have the final say in who gets hired and who doesn't. They can offer an opinion, the same as all the other 4-5 interviewers in the round, and then the bar ra
64.
by northern-lights 6y ago
They may not do that because they are more risk averse than WSB. WSB can distribute losses over individuals and can tolerate, hedge funds probably can't. And it goes without saying - WSB can remain retarded longer.
65.
by northern-lights 6y ago
Not quite accurate. It's - WSB can remain retarded longer than you can remain solvent.
66.
by northern-lights 6y ago
And a few Pokemon ones too with Emerald at the top of that list.
67.
by northern-lights 6y ago
Indeed. The starting salaries of fresh grads in (Wipro/Infosys/TCS/etc.) has been stagnant at INR 300,000 to INR 350,000 / year for the last 10-15 years. Converted to USD this is: ~ 4000 - 4700 / year. 20 USD /
68.
by northern-lights 6y ago
>Bad interviews make for bad hires. Bad hires can cost a company more than not hiring at all. But is that really true? There are plenty of companies who take a Fire Better approach (Amazon, Netflix to name a few) who seem to be doing jus
69.
by northern-lights 6y ago
I'm not sure how exactly it works but if I had to guess, the non-local talent would have fudged resumes showing they had the relevant experience. It's not like the relevant Labour departments would actually do the background check
70.
by northern-lights 6y ago
Some are also designed to be impossible to satisfy so that they can bring non-local talent to satisfy Labour Market tests. Not sure if it is in this case, but there have been plenty of such cases in the past.
71.
by northern-lights 6y ago
Your questions are answered at: 1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aPStj2ZuXug&t 2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blSTTFS8Uco And more such videos at PBS SpaceTime. A fair warning though that that is
72.
by northern-lights 6y ago
It's clear that you are trying to sell something here. Might as well be obvious about it. Direct marketing works best in some cases (and definitely yours going by your other posts).
73.
by northern-lights 6y ago
Not entirely true. See: https://www.mondaq.com/india/contract-of-employment/614370/e...
74.
by northern-lights 6y ago
Not sure why this is being downvoted. This advice is far more useful than OPs. Be careful of anyone claiming to be an expert on anything, especially on an anonymous forum - even if that forum has in general higher quality opinion. And the O
75.
by northern-lights 6y ago
https://www.sens.org : Solving the problem of aging and diseases of aging. Watch a few interviews of Aubrey de Grey to get a better idea of the possibilities of their research. Though this would come under the "to watch&quo
76.
by northern-lights 6y ago
If I opt-out and make my profile non-public, what kind of information in the profile will still be public? Because, in the "Visibility" link in the profile builder says: Your public profile will be invisible and will not appear in
77.
by northern-lights 6y ago
The only Podcast app worth using. I hope Google understands the slippery slope they are treading and its implications and consequences.
78.
by northern-lights 6y ago
When I was looking for opportunities in Europe (specifically tech hubs - Berlin, Munich, Dublin, Amsterdam but not London) few months back, I had cold-applied on the respective Company portals to about 100-120 different Software Dev roles.
79.
by northern-lights 7y ago
Not quite: https://www.umaryland.edu/news/archived-news/march-2020/rese...
80.
by northern-lights 7y ago
Location: Bangalore, India Remote: Maybe, depends on the work profile. Willing to relocate: Yes to Europe. Will consider US. Technologies: Embedded systems (mostly C, some C++), Cloud Backend Microservices (mostly Go, some Java Spring Boot)
81.
by northern-lights 7y ago
If there is development work happening, then there is a tech industry. Perhaps you may consider a tech industry to only exist if it is spawning a million startups a day but that is not a view shared by the rest of the world. See: http:&#x2
82.
by northern-lights 7y ago
Reducing the emphasis on thinking out-loud every single one of your thoughts might have helped. I'm not the type of person who can verbalize everything and moreover, it's too slow and prone to errors. Perhaps I should have fought
83.
by northern-lights 7y ago
Just so you know, salaries in Bangalore are comparable to that of SF if adjusted for Purchasing Power Parity. If you don't believe me, feel free to look up levels.fyi for both and match the conversions through: http://salary
84.
by northern-lights 7y ago
I have tried a milder version of this and as anyone can guess - it did not work. The supply is too much and demand not so, the organizations will always pass. Only if you can get the demand-supply to work in your favour will this work.
85.
by northern-lights 7y ago
You just described me haha. In my Google phone screen, I fumbled around on solving an easy-moderate problem - so much so that when it ended, I felt that there was no way even I would hire me. And once it ended, I wrote the code for it in pr
86.
by northern-lights 7y ago
> As many companies are backtracking from India... What makes you say this?
87.
by northern-lights 7y ago
Please see if it is possible to add Bangalore as well!
88.
by northern-lights 7y ago
Its protected somewhat by the ~3000 steps that you need to climb down to reach it (and then climb up, most likely the same day as there is not enough space for a lot of people to stay the night at the bottom).
89.
by northern-lights 7y ago
Not quite. Because the chance is 0%, the fact that you were able to pick the choice (with 0%) at all implies a contradiction.
90.
by northern-lights 7y ago
Can't edit. Explanation for 6 is incorrect as pointed above/below. Correct explanation is: Lets say 6 is True. This implies that 5 is False. If 5 is False, it means at least one of the above 5 - 1, 2, 3, 4 is True. But we've

More ›