4 ms·
>Bad interviews make for bad hires. Bad hires can cost a company more than not hiring at all. But is that really true? There are plenty of companies who take a
by northern-lights 6y ago
>Bad interviews make for bad hires. Bad hires can cost a company more than not hiring at all.
But is that really true? There are plenty of companies who take a Fire Better approach (Amazon, Netflix to name a few) who seem to be doing just fine.
- wolco 6y agoNot being able to tell if it's a bad hire is the core problem for the rest.
- el_benhameen 6y agoWorth noting that, at least as far as I've heard, the pressure on employees in at least some roles at the two companies you mentioned is incredibly stressful. I would rather have an interview without undue stress than a stressful one, but I'd rather have a stressful interview than continuous stress on the job. (I am differentiating here between "working on difficult problems" stress and "always wondering if you're going to get canned" stress.)