Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
noprocrasted
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
61.
▲
by
noprocrasted
2y ago
They are conveniently leaving out: 1) Apple has a track record of rejecting App Store apps that break the law or platforms' ToS, yet conveniently leaves the Facebook app around despite the company being in breach of the GDPR since the
62.
▲
by
noprocrasted
2y ago
Check out https://github.com/atc1441/ATC_RF03_Ring
63.
▲
by
noprocrasted
2y ago
> which are technologies old and reliable as dirt. Technologies, sure. Implementations? Not so much. I can trust OpenSSH because it's deployed everywhere and I can be confident all the low-hanging fruits are gone by now, and if not,
64.
▲
by
noprocrasted
2y ago
Get two servers (or three, etc)?
65.
▲
by
noprocrasted
2y ago
> AWS infrastructure is vastly more secure than almost all company data centers Secure in what terms? Security is always about a threat model and trade-offs. There's no absolute, objective term of "security". > AWS has
66.
▲
by
noprocrasted
2y ago
What's the risk you're trying to protect against, that a "better" (which one?) way would mitigate that this one wouldn't? > IPA Do you mean https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FreeIPA ? That seems
67.
▲
by
noprocrasted
2y ago
> Amazon (metal instances) But you still get nickel & dimed and pay insane costs, including on bandwidth (which is free in most conventional hosting providers, and overages are 90x cheaper than AWS' costs).
68.
▲
by
noprocrasted
2y ago
Biggest issue isn't even sequential speed but latency. In the cloud all persistent storage is networked and has significantly more latency than direct-attached disks. This is a physical (speed of light) limit, you can't pay your w
69.
▲
by
noprocrasted
2y ago
> And running your own hardware is not incompatible with Kubernetes: on the contrary Kubernetes actually makes so much more sense on bare-metal hardware. On the cloud, I think the value prop is dubious - your cloud provider is already gi
70.
▲
by
noprocrasted
2y ago
How do you configure S3 access control? You need to learn & understand how their IAM works. How do you even point a pretty URL to a lambda? Last time I looked you need to stick an "API gateway" in front (which I'm sure yo
71.
▲
by
noprocrasted
2y ago
3. "Dedicated server" at any hosting provider Open their management console, press order now, 15 mins later get your server's IP address.
72.
▲
by
noprocrasted
2y ago
> identity management (AAD/IAM) Do you mean for administrative access to the machines (over SSH, etc) or for "normal" access to the hosted applications? Admin access: Ansible-managed set of UNIX users & associated SSH
73.
▲
by
noprocrasted
2y ago
There's however a middle-ground between run your own colocated hardware and cloud. It's called "dedicated" servers and many hosting providers (from budget bottom-of-the-barrel to "contact us" pricing) offer it.
74.
▲
by
noprocrasted
2y ago
That argument makes sense for PaaS services like the ones you mention. But for bare "cloud" like AWS, I'm not convinced it is saving any effort, it's merely swapping one kind of complexity with another. Every place I
75.
▲
by
noprocrasted
2y ago
EEPROM programmers and various other ways of rewriting this VIN (turnkey tools using undocumented diagnostic commands giving you unauthenticated read/write access to memory) means it's just one insignificant expense for the chop s
76.
▲
by
noprocrasted
2y ago
I have done so multiple times, albeit in the UK. When collections calls, you explain them the situation (service not provided or whatever, and evidence of trying to resolve it with them in good faith) and they go away. Have yet to see a cou
77.
▲
by
noprocrasted
2y ago
You don't even need small claims court. You just don't pay, and point them to (small claims?) court if they want to get paid for the service they don't provide. None of these shit companies will ever take you up on the offe
78.
▲
by
noprocrasted
2y ago
> mostly CAN CAN is just the physical and framing layer. The data that goes over it is a whole different matter, and it's proprietary to every vendor, incompatible and generally undocumented. For a lot of cars you can't even sw
79.
▲
by
noprocrasted
2y ago
Those tools are mostly based on reverse engineering and exploiting security vulnerabilities though.
80.
▲
by
noprocrasted
2y ago
> Delete bad code. Replace with good code Your points are valid but there's also the issue that the more developers you have the more communication overhead there is, which makes large changes to the codebase hard/impossible. W
81.
▲
by
noprocrasted
2y ago
It turns out you can go quite far when your objective is to solve a business problem rather than building an overcomplicated mess to solicit VC money.
82.
▲
by
noprocrasted
2y ago
I'd recommend a Raspberry Pi instead. Easier to source (you may even already have it!) and I can guarantee it will be supporter longer and better than whatever low-volume Chinese board they're using here. There is zero advantage t
83.
▲
by
noprocrasted
2y ago
You can run in host network mode to avoid that.
84.
▲
by
noprocrasted
2y ago
In the EU, maybe. And even then you will most likely need to beg for an "entitlement" to use it which may have requirements around being a registered business, etc so hobby apps are still excluded.
85.
▲
by
noprocrasted
2y ago
It's not a mystery - it's anti-competitive behavior where they only want to give access to low-level NFC access (required to enable things like door locks, car keys, payment/loyalty card systems, transport, etc) to "part
86.
▲
by
noprocrasted
2y ago
Twitter also said they would not use 2FA phone numbers for advertising purposes... and yet ended up doing it.
87.
▲
by
noprocrasted
2y ago
> We need your contacts to provide the service, but don’t share your contacts with Meta. There are plenty of ways to make this statement 100% factual and still effectively leak the user's address book, at least in a form useful to M
88.
▲
by
noprocrasted
2y ago
Your company has been knowingly in breach of the GDPR since it went into effect and shows no signs of stopping despite multiple adverse rulings and fines. There is no reason to trust a company whose entire business model is based on breachi
89.
▲
by
noprocrasted
2y ago
This is an opportunity for bullshitters (in a "bullshit jobs" sense) to be seen as "doing something" and get pats on the back without significant effort - at least less effort than doing other, actually valuable things.
90.
▲
by
noprocrasted
2y ago
It collects people's contacts and social graphs, which are then used to influence ad targeting in Meta's other platforms. That's why it insists so badly on having full access to your contacts.
More ›