nopinsight

10 ms·

31.
by nopinsight 7mo ago
It’s not that simple since each problem is supposed to be distinct and different enough that no single program can solve multiple of them properly. No problem spec is provided as well iiuc so you can’t simply ask an LLM to generate code wit
32.
by nopinsight 7mo ago
LLMs in some form will likely be a key component in the first AGI system we (help) build. We might still lack something essential. However, people who keep doubting AGI is even possible should learn more about The Church-Turing Thesis. htt
33.
by nopinsight 8mo ago
You are assuming that superintelligent AI will follow every command of users outside the labs.
34.
by nopinsight 8mo ago
Some of Opus 4.6's standout results for me: * GDPVal Elo: 1606 vs. GPT-5.2's 1462. OpenAI reported that GPT-5.2 has a 70.9% win-or-tie rate against human professionals. ( https://openai.com/index/gdpval/ )
35.
by nopinsight 8mo ago
From Claude 4.6 Thinking: OSWorld is the full 369-task benchmark. OSWorld Verified is a ~200-task subset where humans have confirmed the eval scripts reliably score success/failure — the full set has some noisy grading where correct ac
36.
by nopinsight 9mo ago
Extrapolate a bit to when AI is capable of long-term, complex planning, and you see why AI alignment and security are valid concerns, despite the cynicism we often see regarding the topic.
37.
Surgical robot removes gallbladder without human help(ibsafoundation.org)
1 points by nopinsight 10mo ago|0 comments
38.
Jane Austen revealed the economic basis of society(economist.com)
5 points by nopinsight 10mo ago|0 comments
39.
by nopinsight 10mo ago
That depends on the social contract we collectively decide (in a democracy at least). Many possibilities will emerge and people need to be aware and adapt much faster than most times in history.
40.
by nopinsight 10mo ago
AI agents might be able to automate 80% of certain jobs in a few years but that would make the remaining 20% far more valuable. The challenge is to help people rapidly retrain for new roles. Humans will continue to have certain desires far
41.
by nopinsight 11mo ago
The reason is given here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45937772
42.
by nopinsight 11mo ago
My comment above serves as a covert commentary on the utility of current frontier LLMs, which imo can often generate higher-quality responses than some HN comments. (And yes, I did agree with their responses above.) I enjoy the recursivenes
43.
by nopinsight 11mo ago
The comment above seems to violate several HN guidelines. Curious, I asked GPT and Gemini which ones stood out. Both replied with the same top three: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html They are: 1. “Be kind. D
44.
by nopinsight 1y ago
What’s your objective ‘threshold’ or a set of capabilities that would compel you to accept a mind as an AGI?
45.
by nopinsight 1y ago
Creative problem solving and commonsense physics are missing, among others. It is a valuable contribution but the CHC theory from psychology that this is based on is itself incomplete. By commonsense physics, I mean something like simulatin
46.
by nopinsight 1y ago
Agreed that current LLMs have low floors despite decently high ceilings. Note that people who write academic papers are quite far from the median white-collar worker.
47.
by nopinsight 1y ago
Hallucination Leaderboard "This evaluates how often an LLM introduces hallucinations when summarizing a document." https://github.com/vectara/hallucination-leaderboard If the figures on this leaderboard are t
48.
by nopinsight 1y ago
A definition of AGI: https://www.agidefinition.ai/ A new contribution by quite a few prominent authors. One of the better efforts at defining AGI *objectively*, rather than through indirect measures like economic impact. I
49.
by nopinsight 1y ago
Re: the clips above Although we can tell they are inaccurate, what percentage of people can visualize the prompts better in their mind’s eyes? I bet a substantial number can’t even tell the clips are generated if posted without context. In
50.
by nopinsight 1y ago
OpenAI launches Sora 2 in a consumer app to collect RL feedback en masse and improve their world models further. Their ultimate goal is physical AGI, although it wouldn’t hurt them if the social network takes off as well.
51.
SWE-Bench Pro (Public Dataset)(scale.com)
1 points by nopinsight 1y ago|0 comments
52.
Discovering new solutions to century-old problems in fluid dynamics(deepmind.google)
2 points by nopinsight 1y ago|0 comments
53.
by nopinsight 1y ago
More than half of the 2024 links, about 15, appeared between o1-preview’s September launch and a few days after o3’s late-December announcement. That span was arguably the most rapid period of advancement for these models in recent years.
54.
by nopinsight 1y ago
Humans being who they are, there's still a tremendous amount of work to do in this world (and beyond). Does everyone alive already have the best quality of life imaginable, not to mention future generations? Lump of Labor fallacy: htt
55.
by nopinsight 1y ago
The author might use it as an analogy to mentalese but for neural networks. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/mentalese EDIT: After reading the original thread in more detail, I think some of the sibling comments are m
56.
by nopinsight 1y ago
There are quite a few relatively objective criteria in the real world: real estate holdings, money and material possessions, power to influence people and events, etc. The complexity of achieving those might result in the "Centaur Era&
57.
by nopinsight 1y ago
1. FWIW, I watched clips from several of Dario’s interviews. His expressions and body language convey sincere concerns. 2. Commoditization can be averted with access to proprietary data. This is why all of ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini push f
58.
by nopinsight 1y ago
Au contraire, AlphaGo made several “counterintuitive” moves that professional Go players thought were mistakes during the play, but turned out to be great strategic moves in hindsight. The (in)ability to recognize a strange move’s brillian
59.
by nopinsight 1y ago
How long would that be economically viable when a sufficient number of people can generate high-qualify code in 1/10th the time? (Obviously, it will always be possible as a hobby.)
60.
by nopinsight 1y ago
I agree. I just personally wouldn’t want to wander around exploring it continuously for months without more interesting work/goals. Even though cultures and geography may be wonderfully varied, their ranges are way smaller than what c

More ›