nomel

32 ms·

721.
by nomel 8mo ago
What effort was put into their prompt to make them read similarly? There could very well be a selection bias, where you're only "seeing" AI when it's obvious/default prompt.
722.
by nomel 8mo ago
Because they've long ago passed the Turing test. Moderation won't be able to stop it because humans increasingly can't detect it. I see well written people being called "LLM" here all the time, em-dash or not.
723.
by nomel 8mo ago
I would enjoy a "block user" feature, to help this. I personally want to live in an online bubble of interesting thoughts. This seems close (or better, since people I enjoy can contradict my own flags) [1]. [1] https:/&#x2
724.
by nomel 8mo ago
Sure, but increasing something like fucking coal power plants isn't some instantaneous event that could start and stop at any time, putting some ambiguity at the moment between "increased" and "increasing". If plant
725.
by nomel 8mo ago
yes you, a general intelligence, write a specific expert for a specific problem. > If you want to argue that we don't need the concept of AGI, because something like specific experts could be enough to drastically change the economy
726.
by nomel 8mo ago
Parent accounts require an ID [1]. Kids don't have ID. How would that work? I think one approach would be that all communication features could be opt in, by parents. but, that doesn't actually "solve" anything, since pr
727.
by nomel 8mo ago
> It would be an easy problem if the government put in place sensible reforms for age verification. What would these reforms look like?
728.
by nomel 8mo ago
> we'd still need desk jobs to maintain the guardrails. Simply put, an economy and society of managers. That's terrifying.
729.
by nomel 8mo ago
> A predator simply needs not to verify anything and appear benign and ironically more anonymous than law abiding people. Roblox takes the sane approach with this: communication features are completely disabled for "unverified"
730.
by nomel 8mo ago
> But they are not doing enough to protect children from predators My understanding is that the recent improvements are face scans, and communication limited to people within a few 4 year windows. They've also increased moderation o
731.
by nomel 8mo ago
Maybe I have poor reading comprehension, and my google-fu is bad, but I can't find anything that says specifically why this is necessary, or what it hopes to achieve. I found a single "increase transparency". Why is a trans
732.
by nomel 8mo ago
> And, I'm not talking about the indirect applications of a calculator or a specific intelligence. This was an attempt to prevent this exact chain of response. I calculator can only be used indirectly to solve a practical problem. A
733.
by nomel 8mo ago
Youtube recently removed "by upload date" sorting. My assumption is that this allows them to have more time to run their various classifiers, before showing them to anyone, to help prevent seeing a wall of AI videos (which it was
734.
by nomel 8mo ago
I think a charitable interpretation of their comment is that it hasn't stopped us from practical, fruitful, use. We didn't need an understanding of how it worked, or even a word for intelligence , let alone a definition of it, to
735.
by nomel 8mo ago
Yes with the next sentence explaining why, and how future years are planned to decrease. "Ramping up" means planned to increase. Feel free to provide a reference that supports that it's "ramping up". I, and pare
736.
by nomel 8mo ago
So, in both cases it's helping sustain. "Ramping up" means increasing . Is there something I'm missing here?
737.
by nomel 8mo ago
I think you're conflating "knowledge" with "intelligence". And, "agency" seems to be a missing concept, which is the only way for something intelligent to apply its knowledge to achieve something practical
738.
by nomel 8mo ago
> yet right now it's dialing up the coal usage Reference? This seems to be false. Coal is still on decline, while solar is what's ramping up [1][2] [1] https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=67005
739.
by nomel 8mo ago
> On the second, we deported plenty of people in previous administrations without the racial profiling that lead to several of these Americans being detained. This is false, which should be expected, since not detaining an American would
740.
by nomel 8mo ago
This is a strange binary I don't understand. There are humans that can't do the work of some humans. Intelligence is, clearly , a spectrum. I don't see why a general intelligence would need to have capabilities far beyond
741.
by nomel 8mo ago
I'm using the dictionary definition of "general": > General: 1. affecting or concerning all or most people, places, or things; widespread. To me, a general intelligence is one that is not just specific: it's affecti
742.
by nomel 8mo ago
Sorry, I assumed the context was cleared, with the article above. Here's what I meant: > If it can do things as good as or better than humans, in general, then either the AI has a type of general intelligence ...
743.
by nomel 8mo ago
Sorry, what do current LLM architectures have to do with this? It should be extremely clear to you that current LLM don't fit this definition. If they did, we wouldn't be having this conversation!!!!
744.
by nomel 8mo ago
Sorry, I don't understand the question, or how it relates. Are you asking for the current understanding of what specific parts of human intelligence are economically valuable?
745.
by nomel 8mo ago
It's a definition based on practical results. That's a good definition, because it doesn't require we already know the exact implementation. It doesn't require guessing , in a literal "put your money where yo
746.
by nomel 8mo ago
My point is that if you pay a factory in China to make something for you, then the CO2 produced in that process would be more appropriately added to your total, rather than theirs, because it was you were the direct and only reason it was
747.
by nomel 8mo ago
> At the very least, the affected parties would know if a crime has been committed. The affected parties are unsupervised children , who are accessing adult spaces and content. Are you saying the children will tell on themselves ? Mayb
748.
by nomel 8mo ago
And, it's important to understand why they're emitting some of that CO2: Western wallets demanding foreign produced goods, because Western society collectively, and enthusiastically, pushed manufacturing to China.
749.
by nomel 8mo ago
Grok was one of the closest, with expected results: bad PR from the obvious use cases that come with little censorship.
750.
by nomel 8mo ago
> Thus, the ingrained short-term thinking of the markets and politicians I don't think they're the only ones to blame. People want what's cheaper/keeps their standard of living the same. Any of these changes temporali

More ›