nojito

9 ms·

121.
by nojito 1y ago
>Which is cool, but is it something that would have taken a competent dev months to build? Probably not. Right...but it exists today. The days of wondering "should I spend time building this" are gone.
122.
by nojito 1y ago
> What you're describing is called: programming. If you feel copying and pasting documentation is programming, you’re gonna have a really rough time.
123.
VibeTunnel's First AI-Anniversary(steipete.me)
2 points by nojito 1y ago|1 comments
124.
by nojito 1y ago
I have started pulling all my backlog projects of converting my feature complete python code over to rust and with Claude it's been absolutely phenomenal.
125.
by nojito 1y ago
>When you read solution you merely memorise existing ones. You don’t learn how to come up with your own. You can't solve programming problems without reading code. Period. The more code you read the better you get at solving problem
126.
by nojito 1y ago
On average the change was a cost decrease because of the thinking token price decrease. For people who do not need thinking they can use flash lite which is cheaper as well.
127.
by nojito 1y ago
>The main issue here is you can’t acquire expertise by using llm to code for you. You learn far far faster from reading code and writing tests than you do just writing code alone. I've long suspected for years that the bottleneck to
128.
by nojito 1y ago
How about converting a rust library into Haskell? https://ghuntley.com/oh-fuck/ That's from 6 months ago and the tooling today is almost night and day in terms of improvements.
129.
by nojito 1y ago
It’s no different from translating business requirements into code. Djikstra was talking about something completely different.
130.
by nojito 1y ago
Sure but then you can stop paying. There's also zero chance they will risk paying customers by changing this policy.
131.
by nojito 1y ago
>If you use this, all of your code data will be sent to Google. Not if you pay for it.
132.
by nojito 1y ago
This edits the files directly. Using a chat hasn't been an optimal workflow for a while now.
133.
by nojito 1y ago
How often did you use gemini-cli to build on gemini-cli?
134.
by nojito 1y ago
You don't get API keys for that subscription because it's a flat monthly cost.
135.
by nojito 1y ago
Not sure I believe this. I just quickly took a scanned document and the transcription looks good. https://19january2021snapshot.epa.gov/sites/static/files/201... https://g.co/gemini/share
136.
by nojito 1y ago
>So, it means that you and the LLM together have managed to write SEVEN lines of trivial code per hour. Here's their response >It took me a few days to build the library with AI. >I estimate it would have taken a few weeks, ma
137.
by nojito 1y ago
> I suspect people who believe LLMs can accurately program anything in any language are frankly not solving any truly novel or interesting problems, because if they were they’d see the obvious cracks. The vast majority of problems in pro
138.
by nojito 1y ago
So you don’t use any libraries in your code? How about reading documentation? Or reviewing PRs? Or go through source code to build out new features?
139.
by nojito 1y ago
Reading code is vastly quicker than writing it from scratch.
140.
by nojito 1y ago
It's simple. You run the code generated by the llm you will get a deterministic result of said code.
141.
by nojito 1y ago
Of course but the code they generate only operates in one way.
142.
by nojito 1y ago
Except the code it creates is deterministic.
143.
by nojito 1y ago
>Data size is a red herring in the conversation. Not really. A Redshift paper just shared that. >..here is a small number of tables in Redshift with trillions of rows, while the majority is much more reasonably sized with only million
144.
by nojito 1y ago
This entire post is exhibit A on why managers are essential and will likely not be replaced by AI any time soon.
145.
by nojito 1y ago
CSV are a poor format to access from S3. Should convert them to parquet then access and analytics becomes cheap and fast.
146.
by nojito 1y ago
His only miss was actually buying Berkshire. He estimates that he lost out on well over $200B had he never bought Berkshire.
147.
by nojito 1y ago
The engineers are the one's who deleted the db though.
148.
by nojito 2y ago
They leverage https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CURE_algorithm alongside many subsequent LLMs to do ranking and scoring.
149.
by nojito 2y ago
>(basically removing “gender” or replacing it with “sex”) There's no Gender or Sex component to the CDC's SVI methodology why was that dataset removed? https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/community-stress-resource-center&
150.
by nojito 2y ago
Why would they remove any datasets? Also calling SVI obscure is quite hilarious.

More ›