>Data size is a red herring in the conversation. Not really. A Redshift paper just shared that. >..here is a small number of tables in Redshift with trillions

>Data size is a red herring in the conversation. Not really. A Redshift paper just shared that. >..here is a small number of tables in Redshift with trillions of rows, while the majority is much more reasonably sized with only millions of rows. In fact, most tables have less than a million rows and the vast majority (98 %) has less than a billion rows. The argument can be made that 98% of people using redshift can potentially get by with DuckDB. https://assets.amazon.science/24/3b/04b31ef64c83acf98fe3fdca9107/why-tpc-is-not-enough-an-analysis-of-the-amazon-redshift-fleet.pdf https://assets.amazon.science/24/3b/04b31ef64c83acf98fe3fdca...