noitpmeder

10 ms·

31.
by noitpmeder 5mo ago
If a qualification for the role is "appreciation for certain less represented cultures/ideas/..." then sure. Otherwise, for a backend c++ engineer the benefits are significantly less obvious, to the point it's reall
32.
by noitpmeder 5mo ago
If you're not a team player I'd expect you to be on the chopping block regardless of underlying race, mental, culture, ...
33.
by noitpmeder 5mo ago
I think it's probably enough to get your phone to open your texting app with a pre populated number and message body, then all the user needs to do is hit send.
34.
by noitpmeder 5mo ago
Are neither of those things possible with a sqlite backend??? Why would one ever reach for this bespoke database tech
35.
by noitpmeder 5mo ago
And what's your opinion on the em dash?
36.
by noitpmeder 5mo ago
It's probably more "enough people are affected by consumerist advertising that it's effective"
37.
by noitpmeder 5mo ago
How the fuck did Texas get this one right but the rest of the USA is in flames. That being said, things like Nyse Texas paint an opposite picture of the state.
38.
by noitpmeder 5mo ago
You say "a lot of people" but there aren't many of those. The scalpers/pokemon resellers/... making bank and posting on Instagram are, if not outright fraud, at best the 1% to 0.1% of those trying to do it
39.
by noitpmeder 5mo ago
Please do the math on what $50/week could mean to you in 10 or 20 years and compare that to the likelihood you have any kind of edge betting.
40.
by noitpmeder 5mo ago
Realistically though, with the demographics as they are, aren't these young men just throwing dice to gamble against and take the money of other young men? Isn't this a 0 sum game? Or is it more young men vs the establishment wher
41.
by noitpmeder 5mo ago
Because the vast majority of 40/50 year olds don't fit into either category you described?
42.
by noitpmeder 5mo ago
If anything every day we prove the current setup is NOT sustainable
43.
by noitpmeder 5mo ago
How about we just get rid of all the fucking loopholes
44.
by noitpmeder 5mo ago
Why would anthropic at all prefer this approach when that middle man can switch and cost-arbitrage between countless other model providers. We're not talking about what is best for the consumer (ex more competition to force iterations
45.
by noitpmeder 5mo ago
My kneejerk is that most consumers these days expect delivery for items purchased online, and allowing them to pick up their items at a brick and mortar probably isn't the issue. Now, dropping off items you're selling? That probab
46.
by noitpmeder 6mo ago
And tl::expected (a largely identical impl) has been available similarly as long!
47.
by noitpmeder 6mo ago
exactly, use std::expected as the return type, avoid exceptions, and make a failable factory constructor to build your type. Make invalid states unrepresentable!!!
48.
by noitpmeder 6mo ago
What restitution is the average american on the hook for these days?
49.
by noitpmeder 7mo ago
The fact that they hijack scrolling to artificially limit scroll speed is insane to me. Feels like I'm trying to navigate through molasses
50.
by noitpmeder 7mo ago
As I understand it they operate as two separate entities -- polymarket US and polymarket INTL.
51.
by noitpmeder 8mo ago
I actually don't hate this??? As long as parents can set up their own whitelists and it's not up to the government to have the final say on any particular block.
52.
by noitpmeder 8mo ago
This reminds me a bit of a recent publication by Stroustrup about using concepts... in C++ to validate integer conversions automatically where necessary. https://www.stroustrup.com/Concept-based-GP.pdf { Number<
53.
by noitpmeder 9mo ago
I think it's less simping for good and more (rightfully) dunking on Tesla
54.
by noitpmeder 9mo ago
I hate that it's true, but things like this make outputs night-and-day for me. This is the difference e.g. of a model writing appropriate test harnesses, or pushing back on requirements, vs writing the most absolute horrible code and t
55.
by noitpmeder 9mo ago
The point of signing contracts is you explicitly set expectations for service, and explicitly assign liability. You can't just reverse that and try to pass the blame. Sure, if someone from GCP shows up at your business and breaks your
56.
by noitpmeder 9mo ago
So I can pass on contact breaches due to bugs in software I maintain due to hallucinations by the AI that I used to write the software?? Absolutely no way. "But the AI wrote the bug." Who cares? It could be you, your relative, you
57.
by noitpmeder 9mo ago
This is some absolute BS. In the current day and age you are 1000% responsible for the externalities of your use of AI. Read the terms and conditions of your model provider. The document you signed, regardless if you read or considered it,
58.
by noitpmeder 9mo ago
Appointments are a whole other issue (see the extreme turnover in the American executive branch every 4 years). Id rather the head of my local police dept be significantly supported by the populating instead of an appointment from a governo
59.
by noitpmeder 9mo ago
Did you even read the article or review the story? The police showed up, reviewed and even verified their documents (called the numbers on the form to confirm their authorization) and we're seemingly satisfied all was in order. Only on
60.
by noitpmeder 9mo ago
I could be wrong but seem to remember this being explicitly disallowed by Apples terms

More ›