nofunsir

9 ms·

91.
by nofunsir 2y ago
>would it matter that much to you if we used jira Yes, genuinely it would matter to me. I would immediately stop working on said project. I'm not exaggerating when I say I would prefer an excel document named ProjectIdeasAndFinance_
92.
by nofunsir 2y ago
Forcing Atlassian products on your engineers IS poor project management.
93.
by nofunsir 2y ago
>No one ever got fired for buying Jira If I ever owned a company, I would make sure anyone who authorizes a single Atlassian license purchase would be fired.
94.
by nofunsir 2y ago
Redmine does it just fine. And is way faster. Anything you're thinking of that Jira can "do" while Redmine can't is not needed to make your widget. GUARANTEED.
95.
by nofunsir 2y ago
I actually do think it's a jira issue. The death knell of your software engineering team's culture and Real productivity is when the company hires an outsider "engineering manager" whose sole job is to pretend to care ab
96.
by nofunsir 2y ago
How can they know if it's beneficial if I can't even click on it? Are they tracking my mouse frantically looking all over for it?
97.
by nofunsir 2y ago
I used it for many years. Not worth it. That's different from a site actively preventing you from accessing a results section you know is there. It's not like you can go to "forums.google.com" like you can with "ima
98.
by nofunsir 2y ago
Microsoft cloud is[1] indeed trusted: "Office 365 GCC High"[2]. [1] Read: "can be" [2] https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/office365/servicedescripti...
99.
by nofunsir 2y ago
Yes! Thank you. Here's the thread I was thinking of: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33421751
100.
by nofunsir 2y ago
Ugg... that just made me think of the opposite case where you're looking for something and it feigns ignorance...[1] [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CD9YqdWwwdw
101.
by nofunsir 2y ago
There was a post on HN not too long ago about a random 3rd party/open source tool that does exactly this, no? When I first heard about Recall AI, I immediately thought back to that HN article, but can't find it.
102.
by nofunsir 2y ago
It's exactly this. Development of a feature like this surely started during the WFH craze, where managers could no longer casually walk behind people who had to have their monitors facing outwards. A market opened up, and this is not t
103.
by nofunsir 2y ago
100% Agree.
104.
by nofunsir 2y ago
I don't really care what engine is used. Bad javascript between sites raises the noise floor above browser/engine speed differences, and ads and trackers do the same wrt site functionality. I want Safari for the OS integrations an
105.
by nofunsir 2y ago
uBO isn't just about ads, and the mechanisms Stopthemadness uses should be readily available to me without having to install an app-store blessed plugin, for monies.
106.
by nofunsir 2y ago
Yes. But, "... if ever there is a port to Safari, that will be MV3 uBO Lite, not uBO, which requires MV2." --gorhill
107.
by nofunsir 2y ago
Wish I could use Safari with uBO, so that I could use Safari. Tired of feature fragmentation in 3rd party software, but equally tired of ostensible limitations in 1st party software that try to control and prevent every single edge case use
108.
by nofunsir 2y ago
Indexing is INHERENT to a 2D document/file. It doesn't need to be indexed or categories. It can hold ALL the information you want to peruse and compare in a given moment. You just, simply look around and view it! - willy wonka
109.
by nofunsir 2y ago
> Scrolling itself isn't tedious compared to panning and zooming a PDF. I simply disagree, and think the EXACT opposite. Panning and Zooming a two-dimensional, immutable file itself isn't tedious compared to scrolling. (You&#x2
110.
by nofunsir 2y ago
I genuinely think scrolling is more tedious. Have you visited any of apple's product pages lately? Makes me yarf. EDIT: At least restaurant menu sites aren't that bad yet. Can you imagine? "Hamburger. Redefined." <SCR
111.
by nofunsir 2y ago
More than "some". I truly think it's time we lose all the whitespace.
112.
by nofunsir 2y ago
I agree. It's a difference of O(n^2) or worse for drill-downs, and O(log n) for a pinch and zoom.
113.
by nofunsir 2y ago
I strongly disagree. Pinching and zooming a locally cached file that contains all the information the user wants is O(n) to perhaps O(log n), while navigating menus is O(n^2). I would settle for a single, zoomable html page.
114.
by nofunsir 2y ago
Because it's objectively better. I also exclusively use desktop mode, and I can tell when a site's designer can't comprehend this choice.
115.
by nofunsir 2y ago
It absolutely does not. Easiest example in the world. Was the trojan horse two things or was it one thing?
116.
by nofunsir 2y ago
He didn't say it wasn't an accessibility feature, just that it was disguised as one. Just because it's not a game changing feature for some people, doesn't mean its primary function isn't advertising.
117.
by nofunsir 2y ago
No thank you. I just want all the whitespace to take a hike. I certainly don't need this layout if webdevs are just going to put all the content on the center 1/3 to 1/4 of my screen.
118.
by nofunsir 3y ago
It impacts me, and I have a fast device!
119.
Button Long Press Activation
2 points by nofunsir 3y ago|1 comments
120.
by nofunsir 3y ago
The penalty being hefted by truly popular free apps, this seems clearly aimed at protecting Apple’s investment into their own free apps, such as: Pages, Numbers, Keynote, Garageband, Why? Because if you affect one aspect of Apple’s carefull

More ›