nnk

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by nnk 14y ago

   That expiring triggers could be somehow useful. But in most cases it's not worth to query memcached from database (selects). The reason is it's much faster to query memcached directly without even opening database connection. All these cach
2. 2.▲
   by nnk 14y ago

   What you've described it's MySQL query cache. MySQL memcached is a memcached deamon that uses InnoDB storage instead of in-memory storage. The caching is done by InnoDB itself. (and actually it's possible to enable the optional in-memory st
3. 3.▲
   by nnk 14y ago

   Is there an example of posgtres nosql doing like 700K requests/sec?
4. 4.▲
   by nnk 14y ago

   > Just what App Engine already offers No, it doesn't. "The Memcache Python API High performance scalable web applications often use a distributed in-memory data cache in front of or in place of robust persistent storage for some tasks"
5. 5.▲
   by nnk 14y ago

   pgmemcache is a memcached client, it connects to external memcached server. Which is, um, quite useless.
6. 6.▲
   by nnk 14y ago

   Does it support range scan selects (example: "where f > 5") as HandlerSocket do?
7. 7.▲
   by nnk 14y ago

   Even if you don't have any battle.net account, you can create a new one and play the beta.