nnevatie

5 ms·

1.
by nnevatie 15d ago
Yes, I think it would be viable if it wasn't corporations reaping all the benefits (income) from AI right now.
2.
by nnevatie 15d ago
> we won’t have enough people for all the jobs that need to be done Who defines jobs that need to be done? Businesses and institudes do. There is no magical entity that observes the need for jobs and creates them at ideal rate.
3.
by nnevatie 15d ago
Aka. business-as-usual being human.
4.
by nnevatie 18d ago
Yes, it's overly generic and provokes negative feelings in me, only.
5.
by nnevatie 19d ago
Hammers are very efficient at dealing with the load-bearing seams.
6.
by nnevatie 19d ago
Correct. The master BSer is afraid of being replaced by an even better BSer, so doesn’t like it.
7.
by nnevatie 22d ago
Brought to you by Claude.
8.
by nnevatie 22d ago
Since not all asteroids are pulled to the gravity simultaneously, some kind of background starfield could make it clearer that the camera/viewport is moving.
9.
by nnevatie 25d ago
The way I've seen it work is basically pointing an agent directly to the ticket, or via a proxy description. There's a good chance that if the agent cannot handle it, a human wouldn't be figuring it out either, without additi
10.
by nnevatie 25d ago
Is it though? I see this occurring every day in a number of projects I have visibility to. Isn't this exactly why OS projects are over-burdened by the firehose of contributions? The maintainers will want to read the code contributions,
11.
by nnevatie 25d ago
Correct, but I increasingly find that the version control is just a storage for code and a place to trigger CI/CD from. Edit: ...and that the source code is useful in retaining enough context of the problem being solved. So, most peopl
12.
by nnevatie 25d ago
> I sincerely don’t understand what the people who say they no longer read any code are doing Welcome to the present. Like many of us do not read the machine code generated by a C++ compiler, the code generated by an agent is similarly i
13.
by nnevatie 26d ago
Apart from fire and shelter, a person really does not _require_ that much. These are luxury items, to which the basic rationale does not apply.
14.
by nnevatie 26d ago
A mere "inconvenience" would do.
15.
by nnevatie 29d ago
> Buy a good "dumb" TV Unfortunately, you can't have one without the other. The best, image quality -wise, TVs are all "smart".
16.
by nnevatie 29d ago
It's unfortunate LG screens are still the best in image quality, even though competition is getting closer. That said, the best way to use LG TVs is to immediately disconnect them from the internet and use an Apple TV 4K for streaming
17.
by nnevatie 1mo ago
Triplane Turmoil was better.
18.
by nnevatie 1mo ago
Looks like a pretty de-facto Amiga game of the era, to be honest. Amiga 500 (and 1000 prior to it) supported smooth scrolling by simply setting the screen-visible pointer in memory.
19.
by nnevatie 1mo ago
They basically twiddle with the distribution of used output tokens so that the pattern is recognizable by machine means. Nothing to do with special characters.
20.
by nnevatie 1mo ago
Reaper is available on Linux.
21.
by nnevatie 1mo ago
There’s always Reaper.
22.
by nnevatie 1mo ago
Looks ok but easy to get lost literally into the weeds of the vegetation.
23.
by nnevatie 1mo ago
Looks cool. Some of the paths get prematuraly clipped when they're still partially on the screen.
24.
by nnevatie 1mo ago
Indeed - obvious AI slop with the annoying language all of the place.
25.
by nnevatie 1mo ago
I swear, whenever there is a new font, there’s a documentary of its making.
26.
by nnevatie 1mo ago
> we can freely pan the camera around to see the Moon It looks like we can orbit or move around the Moon, instead. Panning usually refers rotating the camera from a fixed position.
27.
by nnevatie 1mo ago
A harness is the heuristics you'll apply to a statistics-based core.
28.
by nnevatie 1mo ago
More slop.
29.
by nnevatie 1mo ago
> Honest limits …and it’s slop.
30.
by nnevatie 1mo ago
Grok, is this true?

More ›