Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
nl
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
121.
▲
by
nl
2mo ago
Deepseek Flash is somewhere around the OpenAI Luna level though. That's not bad (and nor is Luna!) but Opus/Sol are just massively better especially once you start doing agentic tasks. See for example https://x.com&#x
122.
▲
by
nl
2mo ago
I think their point is the size/performance tradeoff rather than outright performance. The point of TurboQuant is the size savings, while still giving high accuracy. It's been a while, but I do recall some high-performing vector m
123.
▲
by
nl
2mo ago
This page tries to make the case the AI generated code is not copyrightable. But the US Copyright Office's guidelines very strongly indicate the opposite, and certainly doesn't rule out AI Code being copyrightable: While assistiv
124.
▲
by
nl
2mo ago
Perhaps. Mere mechanical transformation is not copyrightable, but the decisions about how to apply transformations is. Under US Copyright guidelines "the work will be copyrightable to the extent that their contributions qualify as auth
125.
▲
by
nl
2mo ago
I don't have an explanation for this but I did note that the 2023 UBS report had US Median Wealth per adult at $107K[1]. I wonder if there is a per adult vs per person vs per working person difference in the measurement or something
126.
▲
by
nl
2mo ago
They don't need $200B profit for the math to make sense. Where are you getting that? Anthropic is expected to IPO around $2T valuation. That's around half Google's value, and Google's profit is around $130B. So using the
127.
▲
by
nl
2mo ago
Stripe did $1.9T payments in 2025. That's 1.6% of global GDP. It's take a lot to persuade me that there is another payment provider close to that volume. Lago did around $10B in total API payment volume for comparison.
128.
▲
by
nl
2mo ago
It's worth noting that this is deal that has never been signed previously. There's a release from DoE about it: https://www.energy.gov/articles/fact-sheet-department-energy... That's a horrible amount of
129.
▲
by
nl
2mo ago
It seems very very unlikely that an Opus 5 matching local model that runs on a 5070 will be released within the next 5 years (I don't want to say "ever"). If it does happen then NVidia will sell a lot of 5070s though!
130.
▲
by
nl
2mo ago
Generation of SVGs is (obviously) a generally useful task.
131.
▲
by
nl
2mo ago
It's not running LLMs.
132.
▲
by
nl
2mo ago
Yes! Discovered that on a random YouTube video on industrial design.
133.
▲
by
nl
2mo ago
Surely Anthropic will release a new Haiku at some point soon? It's terribly outdated and way overpriced now and they do need something to compete at that "fast, cheap and ok" level.
134.
▲
by
nl
2mo ago
> Sonnet 5 is arguably the most cost ineffective model to ever be released One word: Haiku Although maybe that was competitive when released? I don't recall, but it's an expensive, outdated model now.
135.
▲
by
nl
2mo ago
I've found Sol excellent at OpenSCAD. But I don't do "compare visual output to target" as much as 3D reasoning type tasks (eg: "Build a G1 curve where the -X face meets the +Z face" etc)
136.
▲
by
nl
2mo ago
> don’t even understand the nature of the challenge Oriol Vinyals was a co-author of AlphaFold.
137.
▲
by
nl
2mo ago
> An agent doing a task with 1 example is one shot. An agent doing a task with a few examples is few shot. I don't think you are correctly using these terms This is a different thing. Yes, giving multiple example is called "few
138.
▲
by
nl
2mo ago
> if the temperature is fixed at a value where the top logit is always picked, then because they weights are fixed, the exact same input should produce the exact same output. Am I missing something? Yes. Your input is part of a batch, an
139.
▲
by
nl
2mo ago
The concept of "stochastic parrot" is that an LLM merely parrots its training data with some randomness. We now know that isn't true - LLMs build complex internal models and output based on that. See for example https:/
140.
▲
by
nl
2mo ago
None of the links you provided talk about what you claimed at all. Instead they talk about forced labor in other industries. That's terrible and all forced labor - including in US prison system - should be stopped. But you made very sp
141.
▲
by
nl
2mo ago
So basically you made the whole thing up.
142.
▲
by
nl
2mo ago
>>> Selling products at a loss relying on government $0 labor cost subsidy for years >> You are going to need proof for this. > Are you asking for proof China is not Communist? No, I literally quoted exactly what I'm
143.
▲
by
nl
2mo ago
> You said that Meta doesn't want to be responsible for age verification - they absolutely do No, they really, really do not! In their own words: > There is a practical framework that directly answers the complex logistical chall
144.
▲
by
nl
2mo ago
> Selling products at a loss relying on government $0 labor cost subsidy for years You are going to need proof for this. There is zero evidence of anything like this occurring in these fields. The ILO has a report on Chinese wage subsidi
145.
▲
by
nl
2mo ago
> $8 motors at a steep discount What does this even mean? There are tens (hundreds?) of cheap electric motor manufactures in China. You can go and order some custom motor yourself and get a quote, and yes you get a discount if you order
146.
▲
by
nl
2mo ago
>> for their ad platforms gives better data > No, they all support harvesting your data so they can continue doing what they do best: building shadow profiles and targeting ads. I think we are agreeing adamantly here?
147.
▲
by
nl
2mo ago
Background: Meta/Facebook, Google and Apple all support age verification. It gives them legal cover and for their ad platforms gives better data. But Meta/FB have been strongly lobbying to make it required at the OS level, so they
148.
▲
by
nl
2mo ago
> Only for China, of course HP, Acer and Asus are now using them https://asia.nikkei.com/business/china-tech/hp-asus-and-acer...
149.
▲
by
nl
2mo ago
I think this is a great story. For those who aren't aware, that strip of land is probably some of the most valuable residential land on earth. HK: $200,000+/ sq m (for premium properties on The Peak) Monoco: $56,000/sq m Mils
150.
▲
by
nl
2mo ago
I sent the blog post to someone right now because it had exactly the kinds of details they care about, with the appropriate level of technical details.
More ›