3 ms·

So basically you made the whole thing up.

• Joel_Mckay 2mo ago
  Which part of the forced unpaid labor noted in the trade policy notice do you think is imaginary? I can't immediately recall the program name my boss from Procter & Gamble worked under at the time. But it was similar to the XPCC labor programs cited in the provided links. One can believe whatever BS a naive LLM tells them, but in this case you were wrong. The import levies/fines/bans will stay until folks can provide proof of reasonable, legal, and humane working conditions for all Chinese people. Best of luck with that. =3
  • nl 2mo ago
    None of the links you provided talk about what you claimed at all. Instead they talk about forced labor in other industries. That's terrible and all forced labor - including in US prison system - should be stopped. But you made very specific allegations about wage subsidiaries for electric motor manufacturer and is zero evidence for that. Now you are moving the goal posts to random "China bad" talking points.
    • Joel_Mckay 2mo ago
      Not really, but one may read a brief explanation of why there is a long history of anti-dumping mitigation with China exports https://kingcenter.stanford.edu/sites/g/files/sbiybj16611/files/media/file/360wp_0.pdf https://kingcenter.stanford.edu/sites/g/files/sbiybj16611/fi... Sealioning means you no longer had a point to make, bye. =3