nkmnz

20 ms·

361.
by nkmnz 1y ago
This is exactly how Science works. He’s right until proven wrong. And so are you.
362.
by nkmnz 1y ago
Silence can say a lot.
363.
by nkmnz 1y ago
Yeah sure, we all know about Gay Pride in Gaza.
364.
by nkmnz 1y ago
Yes, I am very much biased in favor of the the middle eastern state that has a democratic constitution, doesn't kill gays and offers the highest level of equal opportunities for all their citizens, no matter their gender or religion. I
365.
by nkmnz 1y ago
By 2025 Iran had already been known to sponsor the acts of war the Houthis are performing against Israel.
366.
by nkmnz 1y ago
Rhetoric aside. What was the actual record of violence when Hitler published „My Struggle“ in 1925, laying out his ideas of solving the „Jewish question“? Why should one believe the evil of it lays out its plans way in advance?
367.
by nkmnz 1y ago
I made you spend a quadratic amount of time on your reply than I did, so maybe you have mistakenly chosen the silly path of QF yourself.
368.
by nkmnz 1y ago
The problem with the article is that they did not make the point you are conveying here. They say: 1. QF cares only about direct utility 2. $saving a life brings $100,000 of INdirect utility for society and/or the person who's lif
369.
by nkmnz 1y ago
But OP did not follow his own terms: he refuses to take the direct utility of giving your money to charity into account and instead calculates some arbitrary utility of the saved lives, which is indirect utility.
370.
by nkmnz 1y ago
Maybe. It would help if the author were consistently distinguishing between his own assumptions and those he's examining, e.g.: > that’s not the kind of utility we’re trying to maximize Who is "we"? I read it as "th
371.
by nkmnz 1y ago
I don't hold any cards in the game - if QF is bollocks, so be it, I couldn't care less. The reasons why I've commented are: 1) the article does a really bad job at using words that matter to me, like "utility". If a
372.
by nkmnz 1y ago
Sorry to say, but your observation is wrong. They do make explicit statements about the utility of enjoying the arts: > They each expect to experience €6,000,000 worth of individual utility from enjoying the additional €9,000,000 of a
373.
by nkmnz 1y ago
Thank you for replying to my critique! The whole point of me reading your text was not to critique your assumptions, but to understand your arguments. It would be great if you'd do the same: make understanding the whole point of yo
374.
by nkmnz 1y ago
I've never heard of the specific mechanism the article talks about, but it is so full of flaws that I do not consider it a good source of thought about the topic. Just the most obvious example where the author didn't put much effo
375.
by nkmnz 1y ago
> Most of that software could run on prem. No, because that would require everyone to own and operate their own servers. I am very happy I do not have to share my bedroom with a server rack so that I can operate my company - not to speak
376.
by nkmnz 1y ago
In genetically modified mice.
377.
by nkmnz 1y ago
These mice were GMO’d to be incapable of synthesising cysteine.
378.
by nkmnz 1y ago
According to the article, you’ll lose so much weight that you need euthanasia if you stop taking NAC - but only if you’re also a mice that also happens to be genetically modified to not produce any Cysteine biologically. Oh, and you shouldn
379.
by nkmnz 1y ago
proper access to pdfs already stored in notes would be good, too.
380.
by nkmnz 1y ago
fwiw, I think the car barriers never had the purpose to stop cars, but to show people that at least on some level someone cares about their perceived safety.
381.
by nkmnz 1y ago
Does cline expose this retrieval mechanism to the user? If yes, could I randomly chose points in my codebase, ask cline to do its “intelligent walk” and store the results in a graph database for graph-RAG?
382.
by nkmnz 1y ago
Where can I find an inadequate boss so that I can finally start my own biz?
383.
by nkmnz 2y ago
I don't know what you mean by the word "organic", but I think lognormal distributions are very common and intuitive: whenever the true generative mechanism is “lots of tiny, independent percentage effects piling up,” you’ll s
384.
by nkmnz 2y ago
I agree, but maybe call it "Lauge" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSAqTdc-Y2g
385.
by nkmnz 2y ago
May I ask why you chose to write and deploy a whole service in go over using pgsql-http to make synchronous http requests directly from Postgres to meilisearch? This would also remove the need of using listen/notify.
386.
by nkmnz 2y ago
Why not train an LAM, a Large AST Model?
387.
by nkmnz 2y ago
Btw, if you’re looking to migrate to Vue 3, hit me up on github. Handle is the same as it is here :)
388.
by nkmnz 2y ago
Used it extensively with Vue 2, never had any compatibility issues. Moved on to Vue 3 by now, though.
389.
by nkmnz 2y ago
Yeah sure, Europe is absolutely known for their lax environmental regulations…
390.
by nkmnz 2y ago
Probably true and in the same category of wisdom as the old saying: "if you need to ask, you cannot afford it".

More ›