niutech

13 ms·

211.
by niutech 2y ago
We're talking about open source browsers.
212.
by niutech 2y ago
There is pure CSS solution: https://kizu.dev/fit-to-width/
213.
by niutech 2y ago
More about FLTK and Nuke: https://dl.acm.org/cms/attachment/885732b3-c342-45f4-9845-7c...
214.
by niutech 2y ago
Congratulations! As a side note, there is a lightweight X Window Manager based on FLTK - FLWM ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FLWM )
215.
by niutech 2y ago
This might be rounding error.
216.
by niutech 2y ago
Servo is revived: https://blogs.igalia.com/mrego/servo-revival-2023-2024/
217.
by niutech 2y ago
Zen Browser, Floorp, Mullvad Browser, Pale Moon, Epiphany aren't "browsers"?
218.
by niutech 2y ago
There are good examples: https://www.eff.org/wp/who-has-your-back-2019
219.
by niutech 2y ago
Brave or Vivaldi aren't bad. They get money from partnerships, search deals and donations.
220.
by niutech 2y ago
You can root your Android device and replace Google Play Services with microG ( https://microg.org ).
221.
by niutech 2y ago
Even with Android, Linux is not the most popular OS, it's MINIX: https://www.networkworld.com/article/964650/minix-the-most-p...
222.
by niutech 2y ago
Not Linux, but MINIX is the most common OS: https://medium.com/@RealWorldCyberSecurity/ever-heard-of-min...
223.
by niutech 2y ago
Not every web browser gets money from Google - Brave, Vivaldi, Pale Moon, Konqueror, Epiphany, Ladybird, Servo, to name a few.
224.
by niutech 2y ago
Browsers can be profitable, see Opera: https://investor.opera.com/news-releases/news-release-detail... But not everything must be for-profit. Free/Libre/Open Source Software is a prime example. Projects like
225.
by niutech 2y ago
Anyone can apply for EU funds, there were no applications for this time.
226.
by niutech 2y ago
No, Servo only recently has gained traction and it's doing really well in 2024: https://blogs.igalia.com/mrego/servo-revival-2023-2024/
227.
by niutech 2y ago
The EU has funded UR Browser by AdaptiveBee: https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/port...
228.
by niutech 2y ago
I thought we were talking about market share.
229.
by niutech 2y ago
But they are in early development, they are making great progress every month.
230.
by niutech 2y ago
Not necessarily, see The Linux Foundation Europe competently maintains Servo.
231.
by niutech 2y ago
There are many EU web browsers: https://fosstodon.org/@niutech/113285649386968003
232.
by niutech 2y ago
How about Servo and Ladybird?
233.
by niutech 2y ago
Maybe Opera? They have profit from providing a web browser: https://investor.opera.com/news-releases/news-release-detail...
234.
by niutech 2y ago
Maybe Opera would buy it?
235.
by niutech 2y ago
Not everything else is based on Chromium - see: Epiphany, Servo, Ladybird.
236.
by niutech 2y ago
> Can nothing be done to the web to lower the barrier to entry such that an independent group (a la OpenBSD or similar) can maintain their own? Of course it can and it is done: Linux Foundation Europe runs Servo, GNOME Foundation runs We
237.
by niutech 2y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Microsoft_Cor... .
238.
by niutech 2y ago
Not all of them, see: Floorp, Zen Browser, Epiphany, Ladybird, Servo.
239.
by niutech 2y ago
There are examples of good stewardship in open source projects: Epiphany, Servo, Ladybird.
240.
by niutech 2y ago
It's Intel, not Nvidia: https://www.statista.com/statistics/754557/worldwide-gpu-shi...

More ›