Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
nirushiv
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
61.
▲
by
nirushiv
6y ago
ai is the Internet country code top-level domain for Anguilla. I wouldn’t take the endings at face value.
62.
▲
by
nirushiv
6y ago
How does this work implementation wise? One private key per application? Per user? Or refreshed on a per-login basis on the first POST?
63.
▲
by
nirushiv
6y ago
Right, absolutely. But the pattern of “I’ll say something I may regret next year but I’ll just delete it if I really do regret it” isn’t present. Thanks for highlight this, though. A lot of people are seeing it for the first time, I bet.
64.
▲
by
nirushiv
6y ago
I think they mean that other partnered restaurants get 30%. I could be misreading it though.
65.
▲
by
nirushiv
6y ago
There are different types of lies. A lie of commission would be like Grubhub saying “All restaurants are our partners”. The second case (which applies here) is a lie by omission. They are withholding very important information in an intenti
66.
▲
by
nirushiv
6y ago
Dang and many other members put in a lot of work to uphold the culture here. But a lot of it comes down to two things: - The hacker and academia cultures have historically been welcoming of beginners, eager to share, and open to learn and d
67.
▲
by
nirushiv
6y ago
I’m hoping we all have a happy, healthy 2021. 2020 was very rough, and the [almost always] insightful projects, debates, and experiences shared here helped me persevere (and sometimes procrastinate!) through the year. Thanks to you all for
68.
▲
by
nirushiv
6y ago
You’re grasping at a lot of straws here. Showing your business on a globe is pretty old idea. Stripe “ripped off” someone too. Shopify was doing this for cyber monday many years ago. I also don’t think the ICE and DoD deals are relevant her
69.
▲
by
nirushiv
6y ago
The simple answer is because Salesforce was willing to pay a ridiculous multiplier - something like 70 times revenue. Slack came dangerously close to making Dropbox’s mistake of thinking it’s a platform. Sure, you build stuff for Slack, but
70.
▲
by
nirushiv
6y ago
Unfortunately I don’t recall the name of the patent troll. Is there a place I can search these cases up? IIRC, Apple’s evidence amounted to repeatedly shouting “they’re obviously a patent troll” (which they were)
71.
▲
by
nirushiv
6y ago
Thanks both for explaining. I appreciate it!
72.
▲
by
nirushiv
6y ago
Firstly, congratulations on your baby! I’m sure you’re enjoying fatherhood and soaking it all in! Secondly, I’ve followed your work for a little while on here and IndieHackers. Your perseverance is truly an inspiration, so I wanted to say t
73.
▲
by
nirushiv
6y ago
These are fairly artificial constraints. 1. Lidar is expensive for everyone. It’s not like Tesla will pay more than other manufacturers. They’d prefer not to use Lidar, but if cameras just don’t cut it, I don't think they would die o
74.
▲
by
nirushiv
6y ago
Thanks for digging deeper. I saw that it was from an academic institution (TUM) so the lack of useful metrics in the release admittedly ticked me off a little. Dice Coeff sounds very similar to Jacard Indexing for image tasks.
75.
▲
by
nirushiv
6y ago
Can you explain this to me a little more? If spending is up, wouldn’t the stock market outperform Bitcoin anyway? If we have rapid inflation, wouldn’t money go into something tangible and of value before something intangible and perhaps of
76.
▲
by
nirushiv
6y ago
On the surface, this is an easy case for Apple. Their argument is simple: iOS is not a licensed product like Windows. You can’t run it - virtualized or not - without Apple’s permission. I do think Apple will win the follow up appeal. For ev
77.
▲
by
nirushiv
6y ago
Very valid points. I think the key is that you’re going to need a complex model for full self driving. No way around that - even if Waymo starts with a rule based model, they’re going to have to work with black boxes and debug them at some
78.
▲
by
nirushiv
6y ago
I mean - I have no idea what’s going on at Tesla, but its very likely they’re doing some internal work with Lidar. They surey understand the risk with w vision-only approach. Elon, and Karpathy, and Laettner previously, aren’t fools. The pr
79.
▲
by
nirushiv
6y ago
Sounds impressive. But please allow me to rant here: > are more accurate Can we please stop using “accurate” as an adjective for models, especially when reporting on studies? There are many other more telling metrics. Let’s start with
80.
▲
by
nirushiv
6y ago
Very impressive that AP disengaged at the beginning. I don’t have much experience in SDCs, but did some computer vision/ robotics work previously. I truly think that Tesla’s approach, if it works, will win in the long run (ie - next 15
81.
▲
by
nirushiv
6y ago
+1 to changing the pitch. -1 for early stage startups. The time just after raising money consists of a lot of long weeks. Things break during your release, customers report bugs and want more features. Adhoc support for your big customers b
82.
▲
by
nirushiv
6y ago
I took a look at your website. It’s quite clear, and I think a lot of people would love such an arrangement, but a word of warning: BusinessInsider is not a reliable citation - I would try to dig up the original study. Similarly for Forbes
83.
▲
by
nirushiv
6y ago
Great question. I run a productivity software startup, and my cofounder brought up the 4-day week idea. We opted not to pursue it. It came down to a few things: - Onboarding / Collaboration overhead (this compounds) An additional dev i