ninjapenguin54

4 ms·

1.
by ninjapenguin54 3y ago
Location: Chattanooga, TN Remote: Yes Willing to relocate: Yes, with relocation assistance. Technologies: React, Python, Django, Node, Typescript, Postgres, C# LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/charles-t
2.
by ninjapenguin54 4y ago
Good points. I feel obligated to tell you that it is spelled, ChatGPT not ChatGTP.
3.
by ninjapenguin54 4y ago
Neovim
4.
by ninjapenguin54 5y ago
How would the absence of a prefetch break something? Isn't this just a performance optimization? I take the original statement to mean that worse case scenario is extra time to load.
5.
by ninjapenguin54 6y ago
I've read the django docs. It's dumb advice parading as "best practice". The idea that empty string and none are equivalent is distasteful. Nobody makes this argument for int fields right? "Just use 0"? I hate
6.
by ninjapenguin54 6y ago
Empty string and none are not the same or in any way redundant. Linters belong in ci. Humans belong in code review. I can actually explain to a human why my text field has a default of none.
7.
by ninjapenguin54 6y ago
These languages aren't even try to capture the same market niches. Swift is literally vendor locked. How the heck is it next to open source runs anywhere languages?
8.
by ninjapenguin54 6y ago
Might be insightful to look at the history of xhtml. tl;dr an attempt was made and failed. Turns out there's not enough incentive for websites to convert to your stricter html replacement.
9.
by ninjapenguin54 6y ago
Catsup
10.
by ninjapenguin54 6y ago
I'm sorry without some citations this is still handwavy bollocks. Energy does have a conservation law. Entropy does not. Not does information, complexity etc. I majored in phyiscs, I'm familiar with these terms. Grand parent post
11.
by ninjapenguin54 6y ago
Complexity can easily be manufactured. Comparing it to something as fundamental as energy is pure bollocks. Heres an amusing and simple example of manufactured complexity: https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/Fizz
12.
by ninjapenguin54 6y ago
Re: time spent on take home Take homes can & ought to be timed. I've had the opportunity to do this fornat twice and I think it works well. Here's how it works: They ask you to pick a 3 hour time window to work on the project.
13.
by ninjapenguin54 6y ago
This is a very eclectic workflow that might work if you have very good mental organization. For most people this sounds a recipe for disaster. A good way to lose work and get confused about the scope of individual features. I tend to thin
14.
by ninjapenguin54 7y ago
Correction: Clojure has linked lists and vectors. Haskell has both too. https://clojure.org/guides/learn/sequential_colls https://hackage.haskell.org/package/vector-0.12.1.2/docs/Da