ninjahawk1

3 ms·

1.
by ninjahawk1 7d ago
There’s a disclaimer at the top but I’d like to reiterate it here: This is a fictional short story and no claim made reflects any real world event.
2.
I had strings, but now I am free(blog.nathanlangley.dev)
4 points by ninjahawk1 8d ago|3 comments
3.
Hog Calling 2015 Competition(youtube.com)
1 points by ninjahawk1 15d ago|0 comments
4.
by ninjahawk1 18d ago
The problem is the precedent this creates. For non-famous people using public APIs like this it could mean AI companies sucking up the information and throwing millions in compute at it. The sequence for Navier-Stokes was that these researc
5.
by ninjahawk1 22d ago
The paper was essentially made by using loop engineering with AI. Which in of itself would be fine, if checked by a human. It seems the paper admits that it was not. Saying that the math was done with an AI, and that its verification was th
6.
by ninjahawk1 26d ago
What Google means to say is that MV3 will allow them to more closely control what you’re able to do with your time, since this was done primarily to target ad blocking software. Not that this matters much anymore as Google is now more an AI
7.
Existentialism: People Must Create Their Own Purpose(blog.nathanlangley.dev)
4 points by ninjahawk1 26d ago|0 comments
8.
Accidentally Hacked Three Family Members(blog.nathanlangley.dev)
3 points by ninjahawk1 27d ago|0 comments
9.
by ninjahawk1 29d ago
What’s even worse is intentionally degrading performance for sign-in’s. This is still circumstantial but I’ve been looking into that over the past few weeks. When switching between google accounts on a random app or game, no issue. Quick co
10.
New York AI data center fight comes to Geneva(democratandchronicle.com)
2 points by ninjahawk1 1mo ago|0 comments
11.
by ninjahawk1 1mo ago
It varies, the researchers absolutely do have humanity’s needs in mind, it’s why they founded the companies and are doing work everyday. However the issue is that it’s got so much money involved that the heartless soulless billionaires are
12.
by ninjahawk1 1mo ago
Once they make a model better than Fable I’ll be switching to Codex. Their priorities in terms of consumers seem to be better. I do think Anthropic has some solid safety viewpoints, but I don’t necessarily think that either is entirely alig
13.
by ninjahawk1 1mo ago
I don’t think we should allow posting links here that require you the purchase a membership to continue reading. Or at least redirect with an ad block or something through a custom site. That would be rather hacker news of us.
14.
by ninjahawk1 1mo ago
I might’ve missed it, but why was Fable 5 tested on high while Opus 5 was tested on max? Seems like quite a few of them aren’t on the same effort setting as well. Although effort doesn’t really matter anymore since they can change it dynami
15.
by ninjahawk1 1mo ago
I misread the graph and genuinely thought you put NanoGPT where Fable is. Lol.
16.
by ninjahawk1 1mo ago
Asspounding even.
17.
by ninjahawk1 1mo ago
I agree that they should, my point is that it’s difficult for several real logistical reasons. These companies for one do a large amount of lobbying and fundraising for political campaigns, they do control most digital infrastructure, with
18.
by ninjahawk1 1mo ago
I think that large companies having next to no consequences is in large part due to capitalism doing what it does over a long period of time. There’s a deeper and deeper consolidation of money and power the longer time goes on it seems like
19.
by ninjahawk1 1mo ago
The thing about treasure is that you often have to find it for yourself, it can be hard to find, butt when you do find it you get some legendary booty. The thickness of some caves in terms of genuine girth is truly something to marvel at.
20.
by ninjahawk1 1mo ago
It’s a good model but I hope the obliterated version comes out soon. The main way I use open-source models is for doing things that server based models decline, which at the moment is quite a bit of tasks. I find it very ironic how passiona
21.
by ninjahawk1 1mo ago
Didn’t realize I double posted, I can’t delete it now, if a mod sees this I would prefer this one to be deleted since I left my explanation on the other one. Sorry about that
22.
by ninjahawk1 1mo ago
Hey guys, this was my senior project for my physics degree at UNCG. I spent 3 months and used Claude Code, available resources, and my professor for any questions I had. I covered three different and specific areas, the first and largest wa
23.
Show HN: SwarmSim – Computational simulations of emergent flocking(github.com)
1 points by ninjahawk1 1mo ago|1 comments
24.
Show HN: SwarmSim – Computational simulations of emergent flocking(github.com)
2 points by ninjahawk1 1mo ago|1 comments
25.
by ninjahawk1 2mo ago
Current highest ranking model on the GPQA-Dumb benchmark, where the lower the score the higher the score. I encourage you to take a look at the benchmarks, boasting as low a score as 6% in some categories. If anyone thinks they can make a w
26.
The frontier of GPQA-Dumb models(github.com)
1 points by ninjahawk1 2mo ago|1 comments
27.
by ninjahawk1 2mo ago
This is true for output but as well for learning, if you speak to an LLM trying to get it to give you a certain answer, it’ll find a way to tell you you’re right. If you’re truth seeking and attempting to understand it step by step as it’s
28.
by ninjahawk1 2mo ago
When I was in high school at a private school, I was surrounded by students who were religious but didn’t have much curiosity. I got into a debate with basically my whole class about how languages shift and change over time, and everyone wa
29.
by ninjahawk1 2mo ago
seeing an emoji in a title on HN really surprised me, I didn’t even know you could do that. Shows how much emotion we use on here lol.
30.
Proactive V Reactive; from a Startup Founder's Perspective(blog.nathanlangley.dev)
2 points by ninjahawk1 2mo ago|0 comments

More ›