ninjagoo

15 ms·

211.
by ninjagoo 8mo ago
It would be interesting to see if those are only for external sale vs restricted for sale within China. If China allows those unrestricted chips to be sold internationally but not domestically it would be a strategic long-term decision, I w
212.
by ninjagoo 8mo ago
There's a lot of room within those 18km/59000ft and 1000kts/1200mph limits.
213.
by ninjagoo 8mo ago
> Realistically, I doubt there’s ANY system out there will be able to counter small weaponized drones that are flown manually let alone with AI, you might have some workarounds, but never a real counter. Weaponized drones (say D_A) can b
214.
by ninjagoo 8mo ago
> "let alone with AI" what's falling into the AI category here perhaps is the key question, since microseconds counts, and LLM are very slow! LLMs (Large Language Models) are far from the only type of AI around. It's
215.
by ninjagoo 8mo ago
Thanks, that's good
216.
by ninjagoo 8mo ago
LOL :)
217.
by ninjagoo 8mo ago
> Those aren't super rare these days, I don't know why arbitrary credentials would matter for this purpose It's an indicator that that demographic isn't opposed to using AI as a conversational tool and find it useful
218.
by ninjagoo 8mo ago
> How do you evaluate the quality of a summary of a paper you do not have the knowledge to read and understand? Tough question. I think the straightforward answer is that you can't. That said, there is some confidence gained in an L
219.
by ninjagoo 8mo ago
> I wonder if you have asked the same LLMs to explain or summarize a paper in one of your fields and see if it still makes sense. I have, and it does, hence my confidence in its ability to do the same in other domains. Depending on what
220.
by ninjagoo 8mo ago
> Good news then, you're currently on a forum! So we all agree that humans > AI I made the post to specifically disagree with that notion: I think that excluding top-quality AI output from the discussion will reduce the overall q
221.
by ninjagoo 8mo ago
That's hardly fair? Most forum users, even on HN, rarely provide sources for data/insights that they reference. I haven't seen that at work either most of the time. One could argue that it should be, but it's just not th
222.
by ninjagoo 8mo ago
> Read the papers, comprehend the papers, don't make someone else's computer do it for you Why not? Personally, I don't have the specialized knowledge, nor the time needed, to read and understand papers outside my own 2-3
223.
by ninjagoo 8mo ago
Conclusion: HN does not, for one, welcome their new AI overlords :)
224.
by ninjagoo 8mo ago
> I've been feeling more and more that generative AI represents the average of all human knowledge. Have you tried the paid versions of frontier models? They certainly do not feel like they spew the average of all human knowledge.
225.
by ninjagoo 8mo ago
> Almost the entirety of the technology world is English-native. I wonder if the Chinese might have to say something about that [1]: 33% of 2 million funded studies were in Chinese. I posit that as China strengthens and no longer feels t
226.
by ninjagoo 8mo ago
A significant part of my friends and family conversations already involve referencing LLMs for scoping, explanations, deeper dives, insights etc. And it's not just me, they use LLMs more than I do. It helps move discussions along. Wher
227.
by ninjagoo 8mo ago
Will there be a process or opportunity for mis-flagged comments' posters to prove their comment was human generated? Or will they have to simply eat the karma hit and move on?
228.
by ninjagoo 8mo ago
> It's the short, punchy sentences, with few-to-no asides or digressions. Uhh, isn't that how senior management in larger corporations communicates ...
229.
by ninjagoo 8mo ago
Lot of folks on here saying they only want to converse with other humans, for various reasons. But here's the funny thing. I'm pretty sure the frontier models are now smarter than I am, more eloquent, and definitely more knowledge
230.
by ninjagoo 8mo ago
This is a great point. In the past and present, sites like slashdot and HN depend on the users to achieve that moderation to surface useful comments and keep 'spam' down. Now, there are tools to achieve that kind of moderation aut
231.
by ninjagoo 8mo ago
From the paper website [1], the code is here [2] model weights are here [3] [1] https://loger-project.github.io/ [2] https://github.com/Junyi42/LoGeR [3] https://huggingface.co/Junyi42&
232.
by ninjagoo 8mo ago
References for psych conditioning of modern soldiers and impacts on reintegration: (for latter links may have to read between the lines) [0] https://isme.tamu.edu/JSCOPE00/Kilner00.html#_edn3 [1] https://www
233.
by ninjagoo 8mo ago
> Educate me please with a comparison of what China has done to be "some of the most imperialist policies"? Tibet occupation. Taiwan encirclement and ongoing military exercises. Strong-arming African and Asian countries that ma
234.
by ninjagoo 8mo ago
> Brigadier General S. L. A. Marshall’s 1947 book Men Against Fire: The Problem of Battle Command stated that only about 10-15% of men would actually take the opportunity to fire directly at exposed enemies. The rest would typically fire
235.
by ninjagoo 8mo ago
> What is their other possible move here, considering the government is threatening to destroy their business entirely? You must not be American, then. We all know that these corporate favoring contract terms are managed through campaign
236.
by ninjagoo 8mo ago
> If the military is using it in some mission critical way, they can't be fighting the model to get something done. No such limitations would ever be acceptable. You'd be surprised at what is considered acceptable. For example,
237.
by ninjagoo 8mo ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Nacchio Previous case of tangling with the Government. https://youtube.com/watch?v=OfZFJThiVLI Jolly Boys - I Fought the Law Overall, this seems like it might be a
238.
by ninjagoo 8mo ago
Oh, do you mean the terms in Section 6 of the Additional Terms of Service, in which Section 2, four paragraphs before Section 6, exhorts one to read "... carefully, starting with the Universal Terms ...", which is 23 pages long
239.
by ninjagoo 8mo ago
I'm beginning to think that the law needs to be that if there are such egregious terms of service, then the company needs to pay for the consumer's attorney at litigation, no matter the cause of litigation, and no matter the outco
240.
by ninjagoo 8mo ago
They have binding arbitration clauses in their Terms of "Service". I don't know if you can actually take them to small claims court. They got rid of their "Don't be evil" motto for a reason, after all.

More ›