Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
nindalf
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
27 ms
·
331.
▲
by
nindalf
2y ago
> these investors want to see an exponential return Don't think this is the reason, at least for Sentry. They've been in business for more than a decade. The bigger reason is that it would take AWS 2 weeks to offer a version of
332.
▲
by
nindalf
2y ago
You created this account 2 mins before posting this comment?
333.
▲
by
nindalf
2y ago
> The only take-away This snide put-down has no place here. Please review the HN guidelines.
334.
▲
by
nindalf
2y ago
Why is Steam a racket? They provide a service and charge 30% for it, nowhere comparable to the 92% cut here.
335.
▲
by
nindalf
2y ago
The problem is that you think it’s private but it isn’t. If an attacker wants access they’ll get access. At that point the false sense of security is a hindrance, because systems might not have been secured like they would have been on the
336.
▲
by
nindalf
2y ago
Honestly same. I think it has the potential to be a great language and I'll definitely have a look at 1.0. Right now it's more for the people who are fine living on the bleeding edge. Nothing wrong with that, imo. It's hard t
337.
▲
by
nindalf
2y ago
Guy needs a talking to from dang.
338.
▲
by
nindalf
2y ago
Why did that particular instance happen?
339.
▲
by
nindalf
2y ago
There's a subreddit dedicated to stats like this where Messi is so far and away from the competition that he's in the top right of the plot - https://www.reddit.com/r/TopRightMessi/
340.
▲
by
nindalf
2y ago
Are any le Carré characters so flagrantly incompetent? Even the ones who like to drink (like Connie Sachs) manage to keep it under control and function reasonably well.
341.
▲
by
nindalf
2y ago
This is probably a really dumb question, but what "support" do corporations running Java need? What are they getting for these massive fees they're paying? Follow up question, what sources are the open runtimes based on? Is i
342.
▲
by
nindalf
2y ago
We actually have two mechanisms: laws/regulations and customers voting with their wallet. Since we see that a majority of customers consistently go with the cheaper option, we know how they feel. So the "better" firm gets out
343.
▲
by
nindalf
2y ago
This is clickbait. When you read the actual statement it's reporting on, and ctrl+f "social", you find that it is used exactly once. > Input data for MSA platforms should incorporate not only transactional data, customer s
344.
▲
by
nindalf
2y ago
> Monzo in particular has strict limits on cash withdrawals and deposits, because their accounts are often used in the illicit drug trade. ATMs often have fees that the bank will pay for. For example, most ATMs have an upsell at the end
345.
▲
by
nindalf
2y ago
Yes in theory a person could write poor Rust code. But in practice the quality of popular Rust libraries is pretty high. Linus says you never crash in the kernel, which is why Rust code merged into Linux won’t crash.
346.
▲
by
nindalf
2y ago
Anything is possible in theory. In practice Rust codebases have high standards because it is easy to set up. For instance, most production users use clippy, which has a lint that will tell you if you're using unwrap() outside of test c
347.
▲
by
nindalf
2y ago
"Tomorrow" is an interval. I meant to say, is a specified instant within the "tomorrow" interval?
348.
▲
by
nindalf
2y ago
And we're going to say "let's do this a day from now", leaving the software to decide whether that's 24, 23 or 25 hours from now. It could be any of those things, depending on where it was said and the DST changes f
349.
▲
by
nindalf
2y ago
Haha, yes I did. If only the HN textbox integrated with rust-analyzer, it would have caught the mistake.
350.
▲
by
nindalf
2y ago
All of these options work and are equivalent. - let time = Timestamp::parse("2024-07-11T01:14:00Z")?; - let time: Timestamp = "2024-07-11T01:14:00Z".parse()?; - let time = "2024-07-11T01:14:00Z".parse::<Time
351.
▲
by
nindalf
2y ago
Burntsushi has written many important crates in the Rust ecosystem. He started with licensing under Unlicense exclusively, until people requested a dual license with MIT. See this issue from 2016 for more details - https://github
352.
▲
by
nindalf
2y ago
> memory safe openssl This is closer to done than not done. Rustls is a memory safe TLS library that is compatible with OpenSSL in API and has comparable or better performance [2]. It has also passed security audits [3] But your point st
353.
▲
by
nindalf
2y ago
I don’t know why they said that. But I guess it’s the difference between a low certainty and a high certainty bet. In 2024 it’s a safe assumption that a lot of the digital infra we use in 10 years will be based on Rust, so it may make sense
354.
▲
by
nindalf
2y ago
I like the comment that started with "way too many arm chair 'researchers' in this thread" and then goes on to rudely say that the maintainers are doing a bad job because they merged in the original changes by Jia Tan. W
355.
▲
by
nindalf
2y ago
Just another data point. I cloned and ran `cargo build --release`. It took 2 mins and 2 seconds (M1 Pro, 2021). Just want to say, creating a release build is really unusual! You'd do that relatively rarely. Most of the time you'd
356.
▲
by
nindalf
2y ago
> It's significantly more difficult to re-use C It's not, and you're over indexing on your experience with OpenGL. There are plenty of rust libs that are thing wrappers over C libraries. They're widely used, without a
357.
▲
by
nindalf
2y ago
There's no reason? Are you sure about this? I think you mean there could theoretically be an interpreted Rust, but I don't think anyone has ever made a prototype of a Rust interpreter. The closest is probably rust-analyzer (the of
358.
▲
by
nindalf
2y ago
You mean sleight, not slight. That’s no slight on you, anyone can make a slight mistake. That said, the way you put it sounds cruel. Is it your claim that a cull wasn’t necessary or that not culling would have left more birds alive long ter
359.
▲
by
nindalf
2y ago
It’s terrifying that people are using chatgpt for questions like this. Isn’t it obvious what it is and isn’t good for?
360.
▲
by
nindalf
2y ago
The article says that is precisely what they did and the FDA found that it violated the spirit of the law.
More ›