nimish

35 ms·

481.
by nimish 5y ago
Without PPS measurements its hard to say how good this is. 1.488MPPS is needed to saturate a gigabit connection and that usually needs some tricks like poll mode drives/dpdk/etc on commodity hardware.
482.
by nimish 5y ago
Not necessarily: https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/105166/symmetry-...
483.
by nimish 5y ago
Yeah, the idea was/is that you spend 5-10hrs studying for every hour in tutorial. You got what you put in.
484.
by nimish 5y ago
Turns out that mathematics pedagogy is poor, in general. Especially for geometry and vector calculus, where it's either obsolete, busted systems or incredibly abstruse ones. Skipping over div/grad/curl and Gibbs-Heaviside vec
485.
by nimish 5y ago
Nice. Will you open source the code and docs at all? I do get why the irs wants to vet submitters in production but you can't even get the detailed info for development without going through the long verification process. I wanted to d
486.
by nimish 5y ago
How did you get access to the SOAP api? Doesn't it need a bunch of verification and special dev accounts with IRS ? Would be great for the docs to be public. >To receive the distribution of schema packages, you must have an active e
487.
by nimish 5y ago
It'd be much better for the world if one of the tech billionaires spent the money on a biosimilar insulin that could undercut this cartel. It's disgusting that people in america die for lack of an essential drug.
488.
by nimish 5y ago
> Unless there is massive fraud going on That is exactly what is happening, and it's legal. It's very easy to hide profits and move them around.
489.
by nimish 5y ago
Yale's former CIO is regarded as an incredibly successful investment manager in general. That joke was far more true than people think -- the Yale model is now common in institutional investment. Few oxbridge colleges are anywhere near
490.
by nimish 5y ago
It should not be surprising that a system that is subject to lawful intercept requirements has weak encryption, especially pre-lift of the export ban.
491.
by nimish 5y ago
A little bit of both. I don't think WA uses the full Risch algo, but even then, enough pattern matching rules https://rulebasedintegration.org/ beats it in perf. Differentiation under the integral sign only works for c
492.
by nimish 5y ago
A diagnosis makes sense if you believe it will improve things. A key criteria is that the issue is negatively affecting your life. This can be in subtle, non-obvious ways. There's no obligation to be on any sort of medication, but havi
493.
46brooklyn Drug Pricing (Nadac) Dashboard(46brooklyn.com)
1 points by nimish 5y ago|0 comments
494.
by nimish 5y ago
Sure. As a mathematician, the current line in the article _is_ succinct and also precise. Overkill for an audio engineer (my summary might be better). But if you have a graduate degree in a STEM field the sentence should be interpretable as
495.
by nimish 5y ago
The issue is that the topic is only relevant to people already familiar with Fourier series and analysis, so the simplified, imprecise reduction isn't useful there. Wikipedia definitely suffers from inconsistency in who they are writin
496.
by nimish 5y ago
Anyone who sat through a basic lecture of Fourier series (and had any experience with basic calc) should be able to parse out every single term in that paragraph and then combine them to understand "truncating a Fourier series at a sha
497.
by nimish 5y ago
The whole point of US spy agencies _is_ to spy on non-Americans...
498.
by nimish 5y ago
Still leaks count -- you do similar stuff to estimate the minimum and the maximum.
499.
by nimish 5y ago
It's the german tank problem. Serial IDs, with some light assumptions, leak information about the total count of items.
500.
by nimish 5y ago
It was thought for decades the anomalous precession of Mercury could be due to matter, including an entirely new planet, Vulcan.
501.
by nimish 5y ago
The math is correct. Linearized GR and Newtonian gravity are qualitatively and quantitatively different and at "relativistic" scales we should probably see a difference! I don't have the cosmology background to evaluate more
502.
by nimish 5y ago
That is what you are testing! Equipoise demands you don't assume one outcome. Otherwise every single pharmaceutical trial would be impossible since "we can't knowingly give humans a placebo" If the effect is large and si
503.
by nimish 5y ago
Then run a proper randomized controlled trial with comparisons to cloth and surgical masks so we have actual data, not 10000 anecdotes. This was the biggest event of the last 50 years, we can throw a few billion at a real trial.
504.
by nimish 5y ago
Nope. It's circular. We need actual tests in the wild, not models.
505.
by nimish 5y ago
You underestimate the desire for precision tracking, unfortunately. Hiding behind custom subdomains is common. Stepping up to cloaking it to be delivered from the application is more effort but it'll happen.
506.
by nimish 5y ago
How does this beat Schonhage-Strassen (which is the standard way to do IDFT(DFT(a)*DFT(b)) ) by a factor of loglog(n)? IIRC nlog(n) was only achieved in 2019.
507.
by nimish 5y ago
Yes, and "massive" and "massless" exhaustively covers both, with the special highlighting of massless particles which are further constrained to follow null geodesics. Massive particles don't have that limitation bu
508.
by nimish 5y ago
Yep, though massless particles must follow null geodesics specifically. Yeah, the ant analogy isn't the best, though it does show off that movement on a curved surface needs "corrections" from the movement on a flat surface (
509.
by nimish 5y ago
Clifford or geometric algebra generalizes this to spinors in any dimension and signature, so you also get the dirac equation for free in a sense
510.
by nimish 5y ago
It's a pseudoforce in the same way centrifugal acceleration is "fictitious" It's a consequence of massive objects following geodesic motion on a curved space; e.g. To keep an ant on a sphere you would need "somethin

More ›