nik_ca

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by nik_ca 1mo ago

   I use 'Conversations' (from F-Droid) on my Android and self-hosted 'XMPP Web' on my PC https://github.com/nioc/xmpp-web This combination covers 99% of my needs.
2. 2.▲
   by nik_ca 8mo ago

   Location: London, ON, Canada Remote: yes Willing to relocate: yes Technologies: C, JavaScript; ARM Cortex-M (STM32, NRF52, etc); Node JS, Fastify, Bash, PostgreSQL; SolidWorks; KiCad; Résumé: https://ftp.serenity-isl
3. 3.▲
   by nik_ca 10mo ago

   That's actually done already in XMPP (Jabber). Federativity, voice calls, E2EE, direct and offline file exchange, no sms verification and other bs, max privacy and convenience.
4. 4.▲
   by nik_ca 11mo ago

   That sounds like perfect match for XMPP / Jabber. You can set up a server on your domain (e.g. 'Prosody') and then two XMPP clients that support calls (e.g. 'Conversations' for android) will be able to initiate voic
5. 5.▲
   by nik_ca 11mo ago

   Yes, you're right, matrix too. However, I've tried ruining servers for both, synapse for matrix and prosody for xmpp and I should say matrix felt very sluggish and limited, while prosody is fast and insanely flexible. In addition,
6. 6.▲
   by nik_ca 11mo ago

   Do you know where there is no chat control possible? XMPP / Jabber [1]. Private, convenient, reliable, distributed, free. [1] https://xmpp.org/
7. 7.▲
   by nik_ca 1y ago

   omg, not the electron, please! How about NW.js?