Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
niggler
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
69 ms
·
661.
▲
by
niggler
14y ago
PG: has anyone tried reaching out to SendGrid to give a comment? I'm sure if you gave a call they'd say something :)
662.
▲
by
niggler
14y ago
Fox News is a cash cow, and MSNBC is trying to get into the game
663.
▲
by
niggler
14y ago
" the actions that resulted from that." The actions that resulted from that were the employers' fault. If she claimed they molested her (which is illegal and can result in jail time) when they didn't, then you have a point. But the commen
664.
▲
by
niggler
14y ago
I was responding to "Her role is to speak for the company" But yes, you do point out something strange about her tweets. Unfortunately, many people approach this issue with a double standard
665.
▲
by
niggler
14y ago
"I routinely think we'd all be better off if it just went away." I fully agree that Twitter has done a disservice to our discourse.
666.
▲
by
niggler
14y ago
" ... I hope they reconsider, bring you back on ..." She didn't fire the guy. The most she could say is that she doesn't think he should have been fired over this, and I read that part of the quote (repeated above) as reflection of my poin
667.
▲
by
niggler
14y ago
Read your article: "we will not comment on all the factors that contributed to our parting ways." I still suspect this was a firing for many reasons, not just this incident.
668.
▲
by
niggler
14y ago
I for one am glad that everyone overreacted and the situation blew up. If this was swept under the rug or if there was an apology, this would have been a one-off event. The fact that people are overreacting, I hope, forces the community t
669.
▲
by
niggler
14y ago
She says she works for SendGrid but I thought people usually use a separate corporate twitter account (or set up a different one for those issues)
670.
▲
by
niggler
14y ago
"here is STILL no evidence for this fact beyond the anonymous pastebin" Exactly! The employer may have been itching for a reason to fire the guy, and this proved convenient.
671.
▲
by
niggler
14y ago
The problem with this line of argument is that she didn't intend to get him fired. The most that should have happened was a larger discussion. The fact that he was fired was an overreaction by the employer , not her.
672.
▲
by
niggler
14y ago
Was she tweeting from a personal or company account?
673.
▲
by
niggler
14y ago
"the issue of being labeled as the "tattletale" probably plays a big part in most women's reluctance to report real harassment." This isn't just in tech. Some females testified before congress that the same problem was happening in the mil
674.
▲
by
niggler
14y ago
People want Adria to apologize for actions that were outside of her control (like the guys getting fired). If anything, the overreaction by everyone involved merely proves that the issue of gender in the industry is still significant.
675.
▲
by
niggler
14y ago
If this depends on the individual APIs (especially twitter) and sees any sort of traction, isn't there a massive risk that one of the providers could block access to streamified?
676.
▲
by
niggler
14y ago
"A private conversation is one that is intended to occur only between the parties involved." What are your thoughts on the Romney 47% remark? (that was recorded by a bartender at the event)
677.
▲
by
niggler
14y ago
I wrote potential because, although I see it as a joke between two people, I can see how others could be offended.
678.
▲
by
niggler
14y ago
the same people who agree that "we didn't mean any harm" is not a valid defense for them offer a "she didn't mean any harm" as a defense for Adria's decision to publicly broadcast her complaint. You misinterpret the reaction. I'm not sugge
679.
▲
by
niggler
14y ago
I actually haven't done a comprehensive test yet, but with debugging symbols turned off, are the same set of optimizations performed in gcc and in g++ compiling C code ?
680.
▲
by
niggler
14y ago
"She overreacted as did the man's employer, and she has not shown any remorse." The problem is that people are attributing to her certain actions that she was not involved in. She didn't fire the guy; the employer did, based on his interpr
681.
▲
by
niggler
14y ago
"AND the optimizations available to a C++ compiler (even if it was targeting the C subset). I wish the article gave some information about the runtime difference." To be absolutely explicit, because I realize my phrase wasn't clear, I was u
682.
▲
by
niggler
14y ago
I was under the impression that people were complaining about compilation speed AND the optimizations available to a C++ compiler (even if it was targeting the C subset). I wish the article gave some information about the runtime differenc
683.
▲
by
niggler
14y ago
It looks like they changed it for a few hours after I made my comment, but it reverted
684.
▲
by
niggler
14y ago
It's almost too late to do that. Products that were slowly grinding are now seeing much more traction, and the initial exodus has passed. There may be a second one when it is officially stopped, but it would be difficult to compete with t
685.
▲
by
niggler
14y ago
Increases appeal of Android devices and provides another advertising opportunity ("find place to eat" -> bam! hyperlocal recommendation. Restaurants would pay significant amounts of money for that type of targeted advertising)
686.
▲
by
niggler
14y ago
Some people were/are emotionally invested in Reader, and to an extent it was so good that many people were dissuaded from building a better RSS reader.
687.
▲
by
niggler
14y ago
I recommend you go through https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5302116 , which was a discussion in which another person recommended a product. The upshot is that people see HN as a different type of forum compared to other places, and so
688.
▲
by
niggler
14y ago
"This product is very, very effective, and I recommend it." was the claim you made. "Have not had the opportunity to do so with this company." End of discussion. I don't doubt that the people behind the product are sharp, but its very ver
689.
▲
by
niggler
14y ago
"This product is very, very effective, and I recommend it. Disclaimer: I have never worked with this company, and have no business interests in it." Did you personally use the service? If so, could you give some more details regarding your
690.
▲
by
niggler
14y ago
They changed that specific article's rendering. When I and others looked earlier today, it was a real mess. My original comment was near the top when "jpilcher" showed up (based on his responses, it was roughly 1-2 hours after I saw the ar
More ›