nidu

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by nidu 4y ago

   Would be especially inconvenient in places where you have daylight from 9AM till 4PM and where people rely on electric heating.
2. 2.▲
   by nidu 6y ago

   1. You can define enum like `const enum A {...}` and they will not have runtime representation.
3. 3.▲
   by nidu 7y ago

   I'm not sure comparison is correct. If you want routing in jQuery app - you will have some similar concept to routers. Using packers is also not required. And if you want some good automating module splitting in jQuery app - you'l
4. 4.▲
   by nidu 9y ago

   Agree with this one. Reading article i though "Why don't you just drop ImmutableJS in favor of pure js collections with lodash/fp?". I felt the same when were using ImmutableJS. Two collection libraries across the app is
5. 5.▲
   by nidu 10y ago

   I suppose Vue.js is not very TypeScript friendly?
6. 6.▲
   by nidu 10y ago

   Don't you use router with vue.js? And what's so messy about JSX?
7. 7.▲
   by nidu 10y ago

   Probably when you accidentally scanned a document to PDF. Or when you received a document in PDF from some nasty man.
8. 8.▲
   by nidu 10y ago

   Once I tried to make a union of a sorted set and an unsorted one. Result set inherits behaviour of a bigger input set so when i first got my sometimes-sorted set i thought like loosing my mind.
9. 9.▲
   by nidu 10y ago

   It could also benefit from constant propagation (iirc the term) where you could write obj.get(Item.name) and both get type check and stay refactoring friendly (though with cost of some more typing).