nicpoulos

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by nicpoulos 9y ago

   Your specific statement was valid and good-natured, so I didn't mean to attack you here. All I'm arguing against is the adoption of a legal or de-facto definition of "encryption" based on architectural similarity to curr
2. 2.▲
   by nicpoulos 9y ago

   This is a great and really important point. But shouldn't warranting the "encryption" label come down to the security guarantee of the algorithm in question, in the use cases it's meant for? I don't see why non-trad
3. 3.▲
   The Ultimate Guide to Startup Sales Tools(bowerycap.com)

   2 points by nicpoulos 11y ago|0 comments