Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
nicksrose7224
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
nicksrose7224
6mo ago
What is the accuracy of this method vs manual entry?
2.
▲
by
nicksrose7224
1y ago
They do this already, but the problem is it takes me more time to verify if what they're saying is correct than to just use a search engine. All the LLMs constantly make stuff up & have extremely low precision & recall of infor
3.
▲
by
nicksrose7224
2y ago
disagree - i actually think all the problems the author lays out about Deep Research apply just as well to GPT4o / o3-mini-whatever. These things just are absolutely terrible at precision & recall of information
4.
▲
by
nicksrose7224
2y ago
I don't think this is a good take. Discovery & science are inherently meaningful even if the applications are not immediately felt. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) was discovered in 1938, but there was no obvious applicability of
5.
▲
by
nicksrose7224
2y ago
super bad take. by this logic nobody should be excited about any technology whatsoever
6.
▲
by
nicksrose7224
3y ago
tbh i could not tell the difference between this & generic technostep made by people. Sounds just as crappy to me
7.
▲
by
nicksrose7224
3y ago
I dont think they're saying its up to tech companies to decide what has value, more that the development of new technology itself ends up deciding for the rest of the world how things are valued. It's been this way for 10,000 year
8.
▲
by
nicksrose7224
3y ago
This sounds compelling but where i always get stuck is on trust of what the LLM / agent spits back out. Every time I've tried to use it for one of the above use cases you mentioned and then actually dug into the sources it may or
9.
▲
by
nicksrose7224
3y ago
Are you saying it would have been a good thing for your wife's parents not to reproduce? Where would that leave her and you? (noted that childhood you described sounds awful, i agree)
10.
▲
by
nicksrose7224
3y ago
this is not a strong counter argument. Costs will come down. When there is insanely high demand for a product (like there is here) and the thing makes people more productive, costs always come down due to pure incentives to make it cheaper.
11.
▲
by
nicksrose7224
3y ago
my suspicion is that FTL travel wouldn't work with this drive because of what the wikipedia article states here: "Another possible issue is that, although the Alcubierre metric is consistent with Einstein's equations, general
12.
▲
Waymo doubles robotaxi service area in Phoenix
(techcrunch.com)
52 points
by
nicksrose7224
3y ago
|
1 comments
13.
▲
by
nicksrose7224
4y ago
I see this argument all the time. Why are you assuming that this technology just "stops" at the LLM level? If I'm openAI or Google or whatever, I'm definitely going to run extra classifiers on top of the output of the LL
14.
▲
by
nicksrose7224
4y ago
That just seems like a rebranding of "the internet" to me
15.
▲
by
nicksrose7224
4y ago
I got tired of spending hours reading through every review across several different Airbnbs when deciding where to stay with friends, especially now with hidden chores & other "gotchas" you can only find by seeing what people
16.
▲
Show HN: GPT-4 Powered Airbnb Analyzer
(tripwise.me)
1 points
by
nicksrose7224
4y ago
|
2 comments
17.
▲
by
nicksrose7224
4y ago
most (all?) self driving companies are electric. Cruise, Waymo, Tesla
18.
▲
by
nicksrose7224
4y ago
try asking for chocolate chip cookie recipe on chatgpt, it works awesome already. The only issue i see is I can't verify in general if the recipe is accurate (like all things ChatGpt outputs). But these cookies i just happen to know ar
19.
▲
by
nicksrose7224
4y ago
I think it's more likely they got it wrong and are referring to what they assume the size of the universe is. It's hard to grasp why the observable universe is 92 billion ly in diameter
20.
▲
by
nicksrose7224
4y ago
Without any actual implications of them "taking responsibility" too
21.
▲
by
nicksrose7224
4y ago
he's doing it to pump up his twitter followers, which is why this whole article bugs me. It's a rather transparent attempt to gain followers without adding anything of real value
22.
▲
by
nicksrose7224
4y ago
While i'm on my soapbox, i dont understand this mentality that wealth creation is a positive-sum game. Me buying a property to turn it into an Airbnb that I lease out to generate money directly takes away supply from someone trying to
23.
▲
by
nicksrose7224
4y ago
This is a pretty lazy and non-value additive article honestly. All it does it just reference things Naval or Warren buffet has said and then “subscribe to my newsletter" at the bottom. I feel like you could easily write something like
24.
▲
by
nicksrose7224
4y ago
Is there any data to back this up? (not attacking, just genuinely curious, i love learning about mass extinctions)
25.
▲
by
nicksrose7224
4y ago
inflation is a giant beast with multiple causes, one of which is definitely stimulus. There are others too, including the cause you listed. Most things have multiple causes
26.
▲
by
nicksrose7224
4y ago
i think this is a bit pessimistic. You can also use GPT-3 or similar technologies to much more easily train a fine-tuned "real vs fake" review classifier with fewer training examples than was previously necessary. GPT-3 like all t
27.
▲
by
nicksrose7224
4y ago
This is a really nice breakdown -- I made a little side project that falls into your "Extractive" and "Comparisons" bucket: https://www.tripwise.me/ My tools uses GPT-3 to dig through Airbnb reviews to f
28.
▲
by
nicksrose7224
4y ago
I am using it for a little project to make deciding between Airbnbs easier: https://www.tripwise.me/ You basically just enter in the Airbnb URLs you're considering, and it'll use GPT-3 to scrape through the review