nice__two

6 ms·

31.
by nice__two 11y ago
For its eco-system, of course. Their BI tooling is pretty well integrated, as well as (comparatively) easy to pick up.
32.
by nice__two 11y ago
The LibreOffice project has been using this a lot to refactor a large, ancient codebase. They've also developed a lot of Clang plugins, which can be found here: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/tre
33.
by nice__two 11y ago
The sad thing is, they're completely oblivious of the sidebar. The idea behind it is, to use the much larger vertical screen space of current monitors. In 5.0, you can hide all toolbars and exclusively use the sidebar. Try it!
34.
by nice__two 11y ago
Yes. The RTF filter has been improved a lot and this the doc and docx filters did too (these filters share a lot of code).
35.
by nice__two 11y ago
They already have: LO has added functionality (e.g. embedding an .odt in a PDF file, effectively making the PDF file editable or font-embedding), which AOO simply does not support. As good as all features listed in LO release notes are LO
36.
by nice__two 11y ago
The Document Foundation is not a company! It's a foundation!
37.
by nice__two 11y ago
Why not create a bounty then? https://freedomsponsors.org/project/149/LibreOffice#/LibreOf... Or pay one of the certified LO developers to implement it: https://www.documentfoundation.org/certi
38.
by nice__two 11y ago
This is the only valid answer, here. Why is the guy not talking in terms of technical debt, business impact, KPIs etc.? If he really knows his shit, he should be expected to break his technical insight down into layman-friendly terms. Hell,
39.
by nice__two 11y ago
This is so kindergarten-level, I have no idea why it's on HN. BTW, Stroustrup himself has a list of applications written in C++: http://www.stroustrup.com/applications.html