niam

12 ms·

151.
by niam 3y ago
You probably interact with the types of people who are more likely to spend time in the suburbs, by dint of living in a suburb. "Affording" a car in Boston is stressful as hell even beyond the cost, and I wouldn't recommend i
152.
by niam 3y ago
A plain textual reading of the comment doesn't suggest that at all. Maybe you're referring to a different thread?
153.
by niam 3y ago
The goal of govt here is to reach the breadth of it's audience. To that end: it takes some really unproven assumptions to assert that they coulda done better than publishing where people already are . A "scalable appropriate tech
154.
by niam 3y ago
On the one hand, they're right that the new user experience needs some attention. On the other hand: they seem woefully tone deaf on how to do that attending without royally botching the things that appeal to Tumblr users. Good luck
155.
by niam 3y ago
>They're taking for granted the fact that they'll create AI systems much smarter than humans. They're taking for granted that superintelligence is achievable within the next decade (regardless of who achieves it). >They
156.
by niam 3y ago
I don't particularly agree with the title but agree that there's a present awkwardness in the way that users are expected to derive correct insights from LLMs. In the same way that tokenization exists to overcome a would-be shor
157.
by niam 3y ago
How would you represent or interpret the "next concept" if not with some kind of token, though? Language is a communicated abstraction of concepts, and it would seem that internal representations of those concepts can emerge from