ng0

4 ms·

1.
by ng0 7y ago
Please give me a summary of what you intend to express here. I just don't have the time to cherry-pick the information here.
2.
by ng0 7y ago
I think somewhere we mentioned before that gnunet does not require ISPs and IXPs, but using them today is the de-facto default state.
3.
by ng0 7y ago
The don't use the same network, and never have. Jami uses OpenDHT ( https://jami.net/ces-2019/ ), GNUnet uses its own DHT (see for example https://grothoff.org/christian/nss2011.pdf , or the rat
4.
by ng0 7y ago
Would this help? https://docs.gnunet.org/#Introduction If anything could be made more clear, let us know as feedback.
5.
by ng0 7y ago
We should maybe include a "GNUnet in 5 minutes or less" on the website. The old LEGO analogy is nice, and lynX did a great comparison here: https://secushare.org/img/stack-comparison.png We don't really
6.
by ng0 7y ago
A short addition: (1) various forms of onion routing are in active research. (1.1) see for example the "big data, little data, no such data" presentation of Christian Grothoff from 2017 (2) what we are still trying to solve here,
7.
by ng0 9y ago
I've read into this again. 'Replacing' will be clear from context. This was added very recently (2016?) to the homepage by myself and to the official description. The Manual (the pushed content as well as my stacks of old fas
8.
by ng0 9y ago
> but they used 'replace'. Them's fightin' words. You are welcome to communicate feedback to our (GNUnet) mailinglists. We are in the process of replacing the website (Drupal is good, but doesn't get the job done