nf8nnfufuu

8 ms·

31.
by nf8nnfufuu 7y ago
Very rich people are not that common in general, perhaps?
32.
by nf8nnfufuu 7y ago
Sorry, I don't get it. Somebody having assistants who look like models and are from Eastern Europe is suspicious of trafficking women? How? Why? I have heard about Epstein, obviously with hindsight all sorts of things he did can be see
33.
by nf8nnfufuu 7y ago
Don't you have to try to identify a face first, before you can decide you don't want to identify it? I don't see how it can work if you don't try to identify every face.
34.
by nf8nnfufuu 7y ago
The Future (2015) - well, we live in the future and these turbines are nowhere to be seen :-(
35.
by nf8nnfufuu 7y ago
What happens to unknown faces in photographs, you just discard them? What if I have 1000s of photo of aunt Emma, but aunt Emma is not on Facebook. When she eventually joins, and turns Face recognition on, will you rescan all my old photos t
36.
by nf8nnfufuu 7y ago
That's just cherry picking, or a set up. Girl "now" could just as easily have built any other number of sets. Gender specific - well the market to both boys and girls. What else should they do? Try to sell "friends"
37.
by nf8nnfufuu 7y ago
You mean they won't give them to the toy stores to sell? Nevertheless, you can still buy the boxes with random colored bricks.
38.
by nf8nnfufuu 7y ago
If they did so, then presumably because they had more success with boys. The "Friends" line example seems to show that marketing it to girls successfully wasn't trivial.
39.
by nf8nnfufuu 7y ago
I forgot to post the link: https://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/innovation-almos... Sales slump in 1993 - I don't think that agrees with your thesis. Maybe they put out so much stuff out of desperation, to
40.
by nf8nnfufuu 7y ago
Apparently the "commercialized junk" sells better, though. Lego was close to going bankrupt in the 90ies. Apart from the price, I personally can't really complain about the modern Lego sets, either. They are nice puzzles, and
41.
by nf8nnfufuu 7y ago
That's just bullshit, a narrative feminists peddled by posting selective pictures and ads of LEGO sets. They even complain about modern "girl's Lego", instead of being happy that it brings girls to using Lego. It also do
42.
by nf8nnfufuu 7y ago
They are right to be full of fear. Their way of living will very likely be destroyed. I doubt the rest of the world will even notice much. However, maybe to protect the Amazonas, the thing to do is to give the indigenous people guns. Who el
43.
by nf8nnfufuu 7y ago
Especially since a lot of shooters end up dead by the end of the shooting, so it would be difficult to determine what they like about the reports of their amok run.
44.
by nf8nnfufuu 7y ago
So how to find women who decided not to apply to the conference?
45.
by nf8nnfufuu 7y ago
Women being less likely to volunteer as speakers at conferences in general, for whatever reason?
46.
by nf8nnfufuu 7y ago
So what are the gender cues in PHP?
47.
by nf8nnfufuu 7y ago
Men paying for access to women. Not that unusual, I'd say.
48.
by nf8nnfufuu 7y ago
I don't know what background info you mean? You mean you already know that bias exists, from your experience in America, and that Europe study only confirms it? How/what do you know about the situation in America? Tbh it seems mor
49.
by nf8nnfufuu 7y ago
We don't value fields less because women enter it. First of all, there is simple supply and demand. More candidates wanting to do a specific job means lower pay. Secondly, you should ask WHY women suddenly want to enter some field. Ver
50.
by nf8nnfufuu 7y ago
Yet another silly feminist statistic, cleverly cropping context to make things look bad. This is about advisories given to 16 to 18 year old boys and girls. Does it seem possible that the advisors took the track record of the person they ad
51.
by nf8nnfufuu 7y ago
It's not "a structure", there just happen to be few women willing to speak at such events.
52.
by nf8nnfufuu 7y ago
They got lucky, by taking risks. People who don't take risks want to get their share in the winnings, but not their share in the losses. So investing in something is stupid, because if you are successful you don't deserve it? When
53.
by nf8nnfufuu 7y ago
I've long thought that about all those zen masters and so on. Maybe they are just happy because they get to lecture and make fun of their pupils? Maybe some real wisdom exists out there, that unfortunately involves not telling other pe
54.
by nf8nnfufuu 7y ago
It used to be, maybe it still is https://github.com/wting/hackernews (7 years ago) Iirc they didn't want to publish details of the ranking algorithm at some point, to prevent "hacking" of submissions. Ma
55.
by nf8nnfufuu 7y ago
and who gets to change the laws? If it is the current residents at the time, maybe that is fair, too?
56.
by nf8nnfufuu 7y ago
But that is the point - it was not easy to become owner of those high-priced lands, so maybe it is not fair to simply describe it as leeching and parasitic. People took risks to get there. In the same vein, would you all say people who earn
57.
by nf8nnfufuu 7y ago
In a normal market, I suppose speculation would help increase supply - by driving prices up, it would become more attractive to build. Of course if no building is possible, that won't work. Nevertheless, there has to be a ceiling to th
58.
by nf8nnfufuu 7y ago
Nevertheless, if the rules were known in advance, it seems the game is fair. For example if you ponder buying a plot of land, presumably the rules there would factor into your decision. If there was already a rule of "no skyscrapers&qu
59.
by nf8nnfufuu 7y ago
If it is a perfect system, again, why doesn't everybody do it? Just because of the property taxes? Everybody is free to buy land, no? Also I don't think people can just ask for arbitrarily high rents wherever they want. It is a ga
60.
by nf8nnfufuu 7y ago
You could pool resources, and start with smaller investments. Personally I don't believe it is really so easy. But that is the narrative of the leeching landlords.

More ›