newark

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by newark 5y ago

   Those are interesting use cases for sure. It seems like they would have more than paid for themselves. So, what critical issues (technical, usability, etc) did those AR glasses have that would explain the lack of interests in them? Yes, ple
2. 2.▲
   by newark 5y ago

   I can guess which company that was. Management and company culture were specific issues for that company, and they were serious issues that caused their demise. But for AR companies, more generally, what critical challenges (technical, usab
3. 3.▲
   by newark 5y ago

   Would you expand on what part of the user experience is not great please? Is it the UI, UX, wear / form factor of the devices? How might the experience be improved?
4. 4.▲
   by newark 5y ago

   Would you shed more light on why there little interest in remote support / med applications? If there was a need for it, what held it back? What do you see as a common weakness / deficiency in products from ODG, Vuzix, and RealWea
5. 5.▲
   by newark 5y ago

   We have more efficient processors today that may be able extend battery life. AR glasses definitely have to be untethered.
6. 6.▲
   Ask HN: Why did previous AR-glasses companies fail?

   12 points by newark 5y ago|24 comments