Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
neverfone
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
1.
▲
by
neverfone
8y ago
Your third paragraph was enlightening and explained your position reasonably well. I'm not sure I'm convinced, but it seems like an interesting discussion. I feel obliged to downvote you because of the first two paragraphs, why di
2.
▲
by
neverfone
8y ago
Hmmph, I see what you're saying, that sounds like it could work. I think the tab flashing is the critical detail, otherwise you would be confused why things are deadlocking.
3.
▲
by
neverfone
8y ago
I'm not following your argument, do you agree that there are resources that cannot be saved in a shared cache?
4.
▲
by
neverfone
8y ago
Then you would need to know the (dynamically generated) contents in advance?
5.
▲
by
neverfone
8y ago
Yes, private doesn't necessarily mean authenticated, it just means shouldn't be saved in a shared cache. For example, "weather_at_your_geoip.js".
6.
▲
by
neverfone
8y ago
I don't know if there are any good Linux GUI debuggers, but gdb is a comprehensive debugger and can do something similar with the skip command. Any gui debugger for Linux is probably a frontend to gdb, so as long as it lets you passthr
7.
▲
by
neverfone
8y ago
Not a windows user, but the same applies to gdb. What is your proposal? If you're currently debugging a thread, breakpoints are disabled for other threads? That really doesn't seem like what people would expect by default.
8.
▲
by
neverfone
8y ago
I think you're forgetting that resources cannot be shared if they're marked private. You cannot get account_statement.js from your shared cache, it has to be unique to you. There is no easy fix to this.
9.
▲
by
neverfone
8y ago
I don't understand the question, it's either cached or not. If it's not cached, then it has to be fetched synchronously for anything depending on its value to work - so it's slow. If it is cached, then the cached value i
10.
▲
by
neverfone
8y ago
I'm not a privacy defeatist, but I am a fingerprinting defeatist. Here's why: I don't think it's realistic for caching and anti-fingerprinting to co-exist, and given those two options users will always pick the former be