neuroticnews25

6 ms·

61.
by neuroticnews25 2mo ago
Only times i've ever used the emdash was to signal sophistication. It's not like it makes the text any more understandable. Of course some people may have more practical reasons to use it, and there's nothing wrong with more
62.
by neuroticnews25 2mo ago
Writing like AI on purpose, writing like AI accidentally, or just blatantly lying. I find all three options funny.
63.
by neuroticnews25 2mo ago
Unconscious intuition you can't explain in words, thus can't reason about, as the main guiding principle in the ever more cognitively demanding world, yeah, good luck.
64.
by neuroticnews25 3mo ago
With my online friends there's a shared understanding that we'll most likely never meet IRL and probably wouldn't even like each other. It's like mutual parasociality, lol.
65.
by neuroticnews25 3mo ago
I've had flesh and blood humans in front of me and it didn't feel good, maybe you're projecting.
66.
by neuroticnews25 3mo ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49179916
67.
by neuroticnews25 3mo ago
The way I parsed the sentence, the backwards and goofy part is just the """he was probably mostly thinking of “white European cultures”""", not the choice of Latin. Just a concilatory disclaimer to avoid being
68.
by neuroticnews25 3mo ago
I didn't mean to imply there's an issue with humanity, just that talking to people is less effective, though maybe more fun.
69.
by neuroticnews25 3mo ago
Talking to LLMs or reading books is much more effective in updating my priors. Talking to people is mostly ego, signaling, misunderstandings and axiological differences.
70.
by neuroticnews25 3mo ago
This is not the definition supporting the statement that cow milk and almond milk are both kinds of milk. Implicitely relying on different definitions inside a single statement is an example of equivocation.
71.
by neuroticnews25 3mo ago
If you consider getting hired despite value mismatch winning the interview game, then good judgement would be recognizing that you're expected to push the products aggressively even when it's bad for the client.
72.
by neuroticnews25 3mo ago
How would you define milk?
73.
by neuroticnews25 3mo ago
Prove it, I'll connect to any server you point me to, using default openssh client flags.
74.
by neuroticnews25 3mo ago
The cat shoutbox thing was fun, but it stopped working.
75.
by neuroticnews25 3mo ago
I've read more about the case and yeah, profiting out of a cell line from a tissue literally stolen with a scalpel doesn't seem ok, because stealing a part of someone's body is not ok in the first place. Even though it was ap
76.
by neuroticnews25 3mo ago
TBH I feel weirdly compelled to object every time someone raises a possibility of thinking about women without sexual undertones.
77.
by neuroticnews25 3mo ago
Both cases sound to me like there is absolutely no moral right being violated. Maybe there's a line somewhere, like you shouldn't copy someone's brain and torture it in a simulation, but this is nowhere near it.
78.
by neuroticnews25 3mo ago
What do you think is the main reason to have a label discriminating men from women?
79.
by neuroticnews25 3mo ago
Girl (woman) is primarily a sexual category in itself, no dancing needed.
80.
by neuroticnews25 3mo ago
As a fellow creep - just don't watch it while riding a bus or working in an open space. It's ok to exercise your privacy.
81.
by neuroticnews25 3mo ago
Oh, I thought it was rape-rape, not giving foster home girls drugs and gifts in exchange for sex they might or might not have enjoyed. Thank you for doing the dirty work of debunking.
82.
by neuroticnews25 3mo ago
Also, for a more substantive answer see: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49108086 We could settle on a privacy-preserving idea, like physical cards with single-use codes sold in stores after showing ID, similar to alco
83.
by neuroticnews25 3mo ago
Did you mean "plenty of parents wouldn't tolerate “adult” services and goods rendered directly to children" when you said "No one would tolerate “adult” services and goods rendered directly to children"?
84.
by neuroticnews25 3mo ago
If you don't even try to use simple available measures to prevent your own child from vaping then it's unfair to say you have zero tolerance for children vaping.
85.
by neuroticnews25 3mo ago
So the hoax is it was a singular big pakistani rape gang + unrelated cases, and there is no evidence of a racially motivated coverup? EDIT no, wikipedia says plural "gangs" also. I have zero idea what a rape gang even is, an organ
86.
by neuroticnews25 3mo ago
> No one would tolerate “adult” services and goods rendered directly to children without age check I don't think it's fair to say that parents who don't care to use parental control measures already available to them have
87.
by neuroticnews25 3mo ago
FWIW i've heard rightwing people call BBC absolute trash for not covering the rape gangs. IDK if it sums up or averages out.
88.
by neuroticnews25 3mo ago
Larger than Mythos? How is that?
89.
by neuroticnews25 3mo ago
That's why I'm inferior!
90.
by neuroticnews25 3mo ago
Yeah, sorry for being edgy. But remember the understanding of universal human dignity your comment is stemming from is not shared globally.

More ›