4 ms·
> No one would tolerate “adult” services and goods rendered directly to children without age check I don't think it's fair to say that parents who don't care t
by neuroticnews25 3mo ago
> No one would tolerate “adult” services and goods rendered directly to children without age check
I don't think it's fair to say that parents who don't care to use parental control measures already available to them have no tolerance for that.
- amazingamazing 3mo agoParental controls don’t solve all of the issues. The same way telling your kids not to do drugs is not a solution to vaping use.
- neuroticnews25 3mo agoIf you don't even try to use simple available measures to prevent your own child from vaping then it's unfair to say you have zero tolerance for children vaping.
- amazingamazing 3mo agoStrange comment, plenty of parents try and fail to stop their kids to do certain things.
- neuroticnews25 3mo agoDid you mean "plenty of parents wouldn't tolerate “adult” services and goods rendered directly to children" when you said "No one would tolerate “adult” services and goods rendered directly to children"?
- account42 3mo agoThen maybe we need to teach parenting in schools instead of trying to outsource it to the government.
- lII1lIlI11ll 3mo agoThat is okay. The optimal amount of "issues" is greater than zero.
- neuroticnews25 3mo agoAlso, for a more substantive answer see: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49108086 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49108086 We could settle on a privacy-preserving idea, like physical cards with single-use codes sold in stores after showing ID, similar to alcohol. Then a few years later they would ban cash payments for those. Then require sellers/payment operators to report all transactions to a central registry. The slope has always been slippery.