neuronet

3 ms·

1.
by neuronet 2y ago
you are going to LOVE Infinite Jest.
2.
by neuronet 2y ago
There is waste in every org, but what they are doing is the equivalent of deleting files that contain the word "diversity" in them instead of going through and actually reading the files. Because that would take time and patience.
3.
by neuronet 2y ago
A really cool article. From the Intro: > She thought carefully about how operations could be organized into groups that could be repeated, thereby inventing the loop. She realized how important it was to track the state of variables as t
4.
by neuronet 2y ago
There is reasonable debate about their scope and limits, but it's hard to find anyone who understands how LLMS work that thinks they are a passing phase. The pushback I see is from people who were raised to write everything from scratc
5.
by neuronet 2y ago
If I were a trained professional software engineer who found joy in writing tests and TDD, maybe I'd feel differently, but I write software to help with basic scientific analysis, and ChatGPT has been an absolute game changer for writ
6.
by neuronet 2y ago
Will it be a low hit rate? Probably, but I've seen way less serendipitous matchmaking plans than this work out very well. The cost is low for people to just put out a feeler. Also, it's fun to read over the different projects, s
7.
by neuronet 2y ago
At the end the author wrote something without explanation that I found cryptic. It is something I am curious about as I am starting to work on a software package: Avoid “scaffolding” (code generation) I wasn't sure what this mea
8.
by neuronet 2y ago
To be fair, the paper has an emoji in the _title_, so I wouldn't read it as a particularly particularly serious academic study as much as the equivalent of the Gawker of AI research. It is a "gotcha" paper that exploits some