Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
netizen-936824
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
31.
▲
by
netizen-936824
4y ago
You heard "B's get degrees"? I always heard it as " C's get degrees" because grad schools look for B average or above (3.0+) At least that's most of the grad schools I've looked at
32.
▲
by
netizen-936824
4y ago
bUt ThE uS iS a MeRiToCrAcY hard /s
33.
▲
by
netizen-936824
4y ago
How big was the population in 1969 compared to now With bigger population you'll see a greater number of rare events
34.
▲
by
netizen-936824
4y ago
When I see some product advertised as "made with science" I usually assume they have done zero actual research, no studies whatsoever and its just meaningless marketing trash. Those are products I generally avoid
35.
▲
by
netizen-936824
4y ago
How would the mechanism work in your example?
36.
▲
by
netizen-936824
4y ago
Thank you. This was exactly the point of my comment. While some readers interpret the word lightly, there are many who use it literally in the context of biology with a reference to creationism. There is no evidence for creationism
37.
▲
by
netizen-936824
4y ago
Only partially. From my perspective, this was the point: >People have become obsessed with manipulating digits and symbols, rather than building a physical reality.
38.
▲
by
netizen-936824
4y ago
uh, there are more important things in life than money
39.
▲
by
netizen-936824
4y ago
>Who cares if Miami is six metres underwater in 100 years? Amsterdam has been six metres underwater for ages and that's a really nice place. The full quote with context from the piece
40.
▲
by
netizen-936824
4y ago
In my interpretation entities != organisms Entities could be alleles, genes, or gene products
41.
▲
by
netizen-936824
4y ago
No, but I'm not sure what that has to do with the topic at hand Also unsure how that's an appropriate response to a request for citations?
42.
▲
by
netizen-936824
4y ago
Got links to any of those papers?
43.
▲
by
netizen-936824
4y ago
I think that's a reasonable perspective to take, although I would argue that there is no clear goal in evolution besides survival and reproduction
44.
▲
by
netizen-936824
4y ago
Perhaps my example is poor, but it shows that hands are not coupled to predation I'm specifically talking about the evolution of hands, humans are not the only organism with hands.
45.
▲
by
netizen-936824
4y ago
No, its definitely relevant. Hands were not designed with any specific function in mind. There was not evolutionary pressure to "throw rocks at the eye of a mammoth" Did orangutans evolve hands to throw rocks at mammoths? No, th
46.
▲
by
netizen-936824
4y ago
Nothing in nature was necessarily "designed"
47.
▲
by
netizen-936824
4y ago
Who's being authoritarian? I'm suggesting changing how we think about housing
48.
▲
by
netizen-936824
4y ago
Maybe we shouldn't think about housing as an investment
49.
▲
by
netizen-936824
4y ago
Because that's a shitty, unethical way to operate. Yes, the competitors are also
50.
▲
by
netizen-936824
4y ago
The reality is that's only from one super limited perspective and fails to consider the ideals of the applicant and how they think companies should operate ethically. Becoming wealthy isn't the only thing in life, this includes co
51.
▲
by
netizen-936824
4y ago
That's a great question. Unfortunately I don't have the answer but I believe it has something to do with civil v. criminal cases. I just know that's the line of thinking that these top legal minds are using to justify this b
52.
▲
by
netizen-936824
4y ago
It's about being used in the commission of a crime, not that the object committed the crime itself
53.
▲
by
netizen-936824
4y ago
I didn't realize black coffee naturally had sugar in it. How interesting!
54.
▲
by
netizen-936824
4y ago
Word and phrase choice indicated that this was your perspective as a driver I'm wondering why you chose to respond to me rather than the person who chimed in with solid experience and an explanation for you.
55.
▲
by
netizen-936824
4y ago
Thank you for your in-depth response. I appreciate hearing from people with first hand experience on topics that I don't personally have experience with. There's things we don't think about when its so far out of our usual fi
56.
▲
by
netizen-936824
4y ago
I know you're likely being sarcastic and I definitely understand. I can only speak to my experience and that's in the US, although I can't reasonably doubt that it happens elsewhere
57.
▲
by
netizen-936824
4y ago
Not quite, I'm offended by people assuming they know the correct answer about something and making baseless assertions. Asking your friend first would have been the move This is something that seems to happen in the US on a constant
58.
▲
by
netizen-936824
4y ago
How many construction projects have you managed? How many workers for particular jobs do you think is appropriate? Where did you get this information and why is it correct?
59.
▲
by
netizen-936824
4y ago
Sounds to me like we need to write better laws
60.
▲
by
netizen-936824
4y ago
Secular psychologists don't ask you to believe in deities for them to work
More ›