Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
netheril96
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
61.
▲
by
netheril96
3y ago
Is there a reverse scrcpy where I see my computer screen on Android? No need for control, just mirroring screen is enough.
62.
▲
by
netheril96
4y ago
Pure nonsense. If China’s TikTok (or douyin to be accurate) were focused on those, it would never have been popular in the first place. Source: I am Chinese who does use douyin and have seen much discussion on China’s Internet on how douyin
63.
▲
by
netheril96
4y ago
I presume that they have already scaled back TVC usage. But it doesn't make news because it isn't interesting to anyone.
64.
▲
by
netheril96
4y ago
A separate set of dedicated laws of course.
65.
▲
by
netheril96
4y ago
Actually, certain alogrithmic "stablecoins" are designed to oscillate around fiat so it is possible to be higher than $1. An example is AMPL: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/ampleforth/ . Of course,
66.
▲
by
netheril96
4y ago
> Send them to a null address or commit to burning them in software. This only has effect for coins with a fixed supply or at least of fixed schedule of supply.
67.
▲
by
netheril96
4y ago
Email are retained for more than a year. Only instant chats are retained for 24h or 30d.
68.
▲
by
netheril96
4y ago
Care to list some of the bugs?
69.
▲
by
netheril96
4y ago
If only a small subset of people online are able to truly take advantage of ChatGPT, then I don't think Google is as threatened by it as many have portrayed.
70.
▲
by
netheril96
4y ago
Similar statements have been made about metaverse too.
71.
▲
by
netheril96
4y ago
From my point of view the only usage of LLM is generation. Such as writing peer reviews, self reviews, OKRs, when I already know the truth and can edit out any errors. I will never trust a LLM's answer to something I don't already
72.
▲
by
netheril96
4y ago
Traditional search practically forces you to read the sources directly. With ChatGPT, people will just assume its citation is correct due to laziness. I've seen this with many human published articles on the Internet too. The litany of
73.
▲
by
netheril96
4y ago
Google used to be considered different from and better than all the companies you list (except Facebook). Being lumped together with those companies would have been seen as an insult to Google in the past.
74.
▲
by
netheril96
4y ago
Worse in the aspect of market dominance.
75.
▲
by
netheril96
4y ago
On iOS I doubt people use the browser for YouTube, GMail. Those have dedicated apps.
76.
▲
by
netheril96
4y ago
Working on a project with only 5% chance of launch is almost a guarantee that you will be at the front of the queue for layoff when the company decides to do layoffs.
77.
▲
by
netheril96
4y ago
> At least around here (Europe), 1.5-2x more EEs graduate each year compared to CS people, Do you know the reason for that? EE is significantly harder to learn than CS, so it baffles me why more people are choosing EE.
78.
▲
by
netheril96
4y ago
> You're logging in so they know who you are, but you refuse to keep a cookie in your browser so they won't know who you are? The two sentences are not in contradiction at all. As long as he has the credential (password and per
79.
▲
by
netheril96
4y ago
Personally I haven't asked or answered on stackoverflow for a long time. Just one data point.
80.
▲
by
netheril96
4y ago
> due to historical licensing and external dependencies (Java is the big one). If this is a big reason, then a big reason is eliminated since Google has won the lawsuit against Oracle and have moved to OpenJDK so the licensing concerns a
81.
▲
by
netheril96
4y ago
Google itself benefited from that image. Many people chose an offer from Google with total comp X instead of another company with total comp Y when X is lesser than Y by a significant amount. In the future, seldom any one will make any such
82.
▲
by
netheril96
4y ago
Stop. Humans are the weakest link in security, and doubly so for humans with less training and accountability than myself. We have already seen cases of SIM swapping attacks. I don’t want to see this to be more widespread.
83.
▲
by
netheril96
4y ago
When I read the title "Spotify reducing employee base by about 6%", I thought Spotify was reducing the base compensation of all employees instead of laying people off. How wrong I was.
84.
▲
by
netheril96
4y ago
Well, time to advertise my own competing offering: https://github.com/netheril96/securefs . Works on Win, Linux, Mac and BSD.
85.
▲
by
netheril96
4y ago
Sorry. I assumed that the person you named was responsible for Android, given how that would have been a good comparing target for Fushcia.
86.
▲
by
netheril96
4y ago
If the group is well organized, you seldom need to have cross organization collaboration to achieve your goals. Then you cannot claim to have leadership or complexity because stuff accomplishable by a single team is considered simple to do.
87.
▲
by
netheril96
4y ago
Hmm, Fushcia builds a whole new kernel in a different paradigm and then a userspace upon that. Android was built upon an existing and mature kernel. It doesn’t surprise me that Fushcia takes longer.
88.
▲
by
netheril96
4y ago
Except AI plays to the strengths of Big Companies rather than small ones. So MAGA will be the first to capture the winds of AI. They don’t have to worry about an unknown AI company suddenly toppling them upside down.
89.
▲
by
netheril96
4y ago
It is not cheating if the act is in accordance with the rules of the game. What I am against is the rule itself. Never have I named names or suggested that ALL hires of a certain race are diversity hires. You have to put words in my mouth b
90.
▲
by
netheril96
4y ago
And I forgot to say this: all of your words here are ad hominem attacks. You have a condescending attitude implying that somehow if one fails to win, they don’t have the right to complain about the unfair system. An absurd notion, given tha
More ›