netdevphoenix

16 ms·

481.
by netdevphoenix 2y ago
It is an approach to music (more than a genre) that relies on elaborate harmonic structures, freedom of interpretation of melody and personalising the harmony, interesting rhythms and time signatures and a general approach of trying to push
482.
by netdevphoenix 2y ago
why 1 book per month? seems overly strict
483.
by netdevphoenix 2y ago
Isn't spectralism a thing in the modern classical world since the 20th century?
484.
by netdevphoenix 2y ago
How are you so knowledgeable about music theory and classical music given that you didn't study music? Just curious
485.
by netdevphoenix 2y ago
that's the easiest position imo. It's AI unless proven otherwise. No one has the time to place this much detailed on a random video when the purpose of the video is just entertainment. What this might lead to though is people losi
486.
by netdevphoenix 2y ago
Monopolies are not easy to defeat. Look at how bad IE was and how much better FF and Chrome were. Both were free and yet IE still dominated for a very long time.
487.
by netdevphoenix 2y ago
Can you please elaborate further? My point is that truly world shattering groundbreaking scientific progress has slowed down significantly this century compared to the previous ones (by comparing just the first 20 years of each century)
488.
by netdevphoenix 2y ago
19th century: electromagnetism, the voltaic pile, the double slit experiment for the light wave theory 20th century: general/special relativity, radioactive decay, discovery of the electron 21st century: crisp and deep learning Hard to
489.
by netdevphoenix 2y ago
Progress is not linear. For all we know, in 2027 things will slow down to a virtual halt for the next 30 years. Look at how much big science progressed in the first 20 years of the 19th century/20th century and look how little it has p
490.
by netdevphoenix 2y ago
My point stands
491.
by netdevphoenix 2y ago
It would be nice if people actually stated why is x better than y rather than expecting everyone to hold the same opinion as them. Makes for better conversations. I don't get why people having this narrowminded view of literature/
492.
by netdevphoenix 2y ago
You are assuming that it is objectively true that "Harry Potter is better than Ulysses, AC/DC is better than Carla Frey". What is your basis for that? And what is your definition of "better"?
493.
by netdevphoenix 2y ago
It is a typical HN behaviour to downvote you when they don't like your comment regardless of whether the comment is right or not even though you are not supposed to downvote for those reasons
494.
by netdevphoenix 2y ago
What exactly do you mean by "related to the Mayas"? We are all related to each to a certain degree
495.
by netdevphoenix 2y ago
There seems to be a trend of people ditching Kube, I wonder why. There are currently two trending articles about this right now on this website
496.
by netdevphoenix 2y ago
Is it? As far as I understand it is a philosophy. Like many ideologies, it got turn into a religion afterwards
497.
by netdevphoenix 2y ago
Milennia is the plural form of millennium. So multi-millennia is redundant
498.
by netdevphoenix 2y ago
When was the last time you saw a public website like that? prod.companyname.com websites are extremely rare especially outside tech.