4 ms·
You are assuming that it is objectively true that "Harry Potter is better than Ulysses, AC/DC is better than Carla Frey". What is your basis for that? And what
by netdevphoenix 2y ago
You are assuming that it is objectively true that "Harry Potter is better than Ulysses, AC/DC is better than Carla Frey". What is your basis for that? And what is your definition of "better"?
- spacechild1 2y agoIf all, they are assuming the opposite.
- netdevphoenix 2y agoMy point stands
- snapcaster 2y agoI get the point you're trying to make, and in some philosophical sense you're right. In reality though, people into a field are able to rank quality extremely well and it doesn't end up being the puzzle you're implying it is