neonskies

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by neonskies 3y ago

   In case your diet is not up to par(too much sugary and fried stuff, say), you could try hiring a nutritionist especially given that you have $ for a psychiatrist. Not that diet/nutrition science is all that rigorous, but at least they
2. 2.▲
   by neonskies 3y ago

   This index needs real time updating. As a citizen of Kazakhstan I know that I don't need a visa to visit Andorra for example. Given the recent world events, I am sure the visa requirements for those affected have changed(and changing)
3. 3.▲
   by neonskies 3y ago

   > 1 -> .1 2 -> .01 3 -> .001 4 -> .0001 5 -> .00001 6 -> .000001 . -> .0∞1 That would only count the rationals which you can definitely count off a carefully arranged matrix of rationals. But reals = rationals and ir
4. 4.▲
   by neonskies 3y ago

   Not sure what's on the vid. Didn't watch it. But if I understand you correctly, the following is impossible as shown in Cantor's simple diagonalization argument: > Follow each branch as deeply as possible counting all sub
5. 5.▲
   by neonskies 3y ago

   > Going further R (points on a line) to R^2 (points on a plane) is also the same cardinality. The proofs are over my head but they're out there. It's just a matter of finding a suitable set of functions. For example, you can tr
6. 6.▲
   by neonskies 3y ago

   > Take the infinities of all numbers > 0 and then all even numbers > 0. Define your number first, then we'll work it out from there. From the looks of it, you are considering the integers. > So you have > 1,2,3,4,5,6,...