neoh

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by neoh 9y ago

   It depends entirely on the budget really. Meteor is great for turning over applications quickly, but that's it. Ember is a better frontend full stack framework and if the server is to be built by someone else, go with Ember. If the bu
2. 2.▲
   by neoh 9y ago

   Some Standford students seem to have done something quite similar already. https://web.stanford.edu/~skatti/pubs/sigcomm15-backfi.pdf
3. 3.▲
   by neoh 9y ago

   Since when did CSRF and open redirect exploits become serious? Quite common and minor really.
4. 4.▲
   by neoh 9y ago

   This doesn't exactly stop you from doing that though. Companies that need to turn over products quickly and efficiently would benefit a lot from this but I wouldn't see myself using it for everything either.
5. 5.▲
   by neoh 9y ago

   Why wouldn't Amazon use its recently acquired c9.io as the development tool for this? Did they buy it just to drive it into the ground because activity from the staff has dropped quite a lot.
6. 6.▲
   by neoh 10y ago

   They're the clear market winner but some companies might need an internal youtube clone or might need to adapt a similar system that they would find his useful for. But hey if it has enough bells and whistles it could be the facebook t