neel8986

13 ms·

31.
by neel8986 3y ago
Interestingly cloud is profitable. Even being 3rd, GCP is a 30B dollar business growing at 27%.
32.
by neel8986 3y ago
You do realize that ChatGPT is owned partially by another ad gint Microsoft who is also hell bent on showing ads in start menu
33.
by neel8986 3y ago
Raising money is ok. Selling 50% of your company for 10B the company when apparantly you have trillion dollar defensible business dont any business sense.
34.
by neel8986 3y ago
They were in Deepmind when the research were done.
35.
by neel8986 3y ago
>> To be clear, Google does use AI. They use it so heavily that they've designed four generations of training accelerators. This +100 Somehow there is a perception that chat bots are the only example of AI research or product tha
36.
by neel8986 3y ago
This is not a typical VC based company. According the HN crowd this is the one company who can execute on AI and challenge Google and all other trillion dollar AI labs. In my opinion they themselves are aware of the fact they are one trick
37.
by neel8986 3y ago
Generative AI at its current state is still a very new area of research with many issues including hallucination, bias and legal baggage. So for the first few version we are looking at many new startups like open ai, stability, anthropic et
38.
by neel8986 3y ago
Original idea for the paper coming from deepmind https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017/file/d...
39.
by neel8986 3y ago
Outside world is looking at AI innovation only in recent times forgetting the entire journey of last decade. If there was any remotely defensible technology in OpenAI they wouldn't have sold 50% of their company for 10B.
40.
by neel8986 3y ago
Product based on no fundamental innovation is also a path to irrelevance. If there was even something remotely defensible in GPTs then OpenAI would not have sold 50% of company for 10B dollar. Only a matter of time and large about of human
41.
by neel8986 3y ago
>> Overall, I am not convinced this will be massively beneficial. I don't trust Google's ability to execute at scale in this area. Yes the team which literally created transformer and almost all the important open research i
42.
by neel8986 3y ago
I agree with this. Last decade was golden age of AI where all major players including Google brain, deepmind, FAIR, Microsoft Research contributed a lot. To honest OpenAI had the least intellectual contribution of them all except of few mar
43.
by neel8986 4y ago
Because youtube is owned by google and google can stop download at scale
44.
by neel8986 4y ago
And why will google allow them to do that at scale?
45.
by neel8986 4y ago
Youtube. This is where Google have huge advantage having largest collection of user generated video
46.
by neel8986 4y ago
A company like google or microsoft can easily be thought off as conglomeration of 5 or more companies. Mostly in such cases job of ceo is resource allocation and strategic thinking. If those companies can have a ceo then elon can also try
47.
by neel8986 4y ago
>> Mass unemployment is a likely outcome, but modern states already have amazing safety nets in place and they're not far away from a universal basic income. very few western and east asian nation have that. 80% of population don
48.
by neel8986 4y ago
Meta can be a extremely significant player in generative AI. Meta owns few of the largest interface of chat UI through Whatsapp, Messengar and Insta. Inserting a chatbot can hook more people in the eco system. You can book your cab or order
49.
by neel8986 4y ago
Yes and tech was so path breaking and innovative that the company sold its 49% share for 10 billion dollar /s. Sam Altman is extremely experienced in the VC world and could have easily raised billions for potential value. He wouldn&#x
50.
by neel8986 4y ago
Exactly. And how much money typescript is making for MS. This are not products
51.
by neel8986 4y ago
Yes program that hallucinates and makes up numbers is going to be the perfect accountant /s
52.
by neel8986 4y ago
How exactly will ChatGPT will revolutionize economy. The best it is doing is summarisation of search result. And search engines exist from 2000s. Yes instead of visiting wikipedia now we get the result directly. At max it can decrease the n
53.
by neel8986 4y ago
And then we will need another set of frontline workers when LLMs starts to hallucinate.
54.
by neel8986 4y ago
In that case llm are summarisation tool which exist in every major search engine. I dont see any use case where the search query for black dress or ticket to paris is going to change. Those require fundamental change in either computer visi
55.
by neel8986 4y ago
I dont think that is a product. Google have created dar more important products including kubernetes, go, flutter as well many ML architecture including transformer
56.
by neel8986 4y ago
There is no margin for any company for providing solution to coding snippets. Search engines earn money through travel, shopping and digital products. All of them are highly real time, visaul with deep integration to supply chain. Hallucina
57.
by neel8986 4y ago
Microsoft have not shown innovation. They have bought innovative companies at regular interval including github and openAI which is op's point. Otherwise they have blatantly copied alternative and forced them to enterprise companies li
58.
by neel8986 4y ago
This is a very specific HN sentiment. Not sure if the same sentiment is shared by general public
59.
by neel8986 4y ago
This like a great step to moving DL away from Nvidia chokehold. Given large LLMs can take upto few cents per token in cloud Nvidia GPUs, this looks like a great way to bring the cost down
60.
by neel8986 4y ago
youtube, android, chrome, maps, google doc, drive to name a few.

More ›