nec4b

6 ms·

91.
by nec4b 1y ago
As someone already mentioned before, I don't think you are talking about the same terminal as others are. >> need an enormous array of hacks to emulate basic features What are those hacks. As far as I can remember, TUIs ran faste
92.
by nec4b 1y ago
>> What I'm saying is that they can't do anything I can't do in a terminal. Why do you need a terminal for if you can do all that with flipping switches and looking at LEDs?
93.
by nec4b 1y ago
There are plenty of layoffs and firings in European countries too. You must have been incredible lucky if have never witnessed it. Each country has different laws regarding employment and it varies a lot between them. Making this Europe vs
94.
by nec4b 1y ago
Thanks for the podcast. >>Renewables have the potential to significantly lessen these conflicts compared to what's happened with fossil fuels. I'm not too optimistic about it. As usual, on one side you have countries with bi
95.
by nec4b 1y ago
>> We're up to about 8 billion solar panels produced ever, maybe 2 billion or so a year now. You need a lot of panels to match one nuclear power plant though, and they were/are heavily subsidized. >> There's been
96.
by nec4b 1y ago
>>What percentage of the earth's surface have little wind and solar? What percentage of the human population live there? Large parts of USA, Canada, non Mediterranean Europe and northern half of Asia. A lot of people live there.
97.
by nec4b 1y ago
I asked which economic law makes ONLY renewables getting cheaper with time. Why couldn't nuclear also get cheaper? Maxwell laws can't help with geopolitics though.
98.
by nec4b 1y ago
Would point to the law of economics which says only renewables can get cheaper with investments? And which law of physics makes renewables work in places, which have little wind and solar?
99.
by nec4b 1y ago
By that logic we should not act upon anything. E.g. if a car is accelerating towards you while you are crossing the road it would be prudent to speed up or delay your crossing and not to ignore it and say they will surely decelerate at any
100.
by nec4b 1y ago
>> Did you? Literally the first line was starting with ">> Yugoslav communism...". #Especially since I said[0]: #"Once, as a child because I wasn't paying attention. As a teen? Several #attempts on the subway
101.
by nec4b 1y ago
No need to be snark. Unlike your comment, where you iterated what happened to you without any time specifics, my comment was for a specific time period as evident from the discussion.
102.
by nec4b 1y ago
Actually you have not mentioned it was 35-50 years ago. But thank you clearing it up.
103.
by nec4b 1y ago
Where do you see a discussion about taxes? We are talking about communists killing people because they are of the wrong class and nazis killing people because they are of the wrong race.
104.
by nec4b 1y ago
I have not mentioned or discussed taxes in this thread about equating communism and nazism.
105.
by nec4b 1y ago
Your city doesn't sound very safe as you claim in another comment.
106.
by nec4b 1y ago
The debate would go much nicer if you could just explain your point of view, which I kindly asked you twice now. Instead you are asking me what I assume are rhetorical questions from your perspective.
107.
by nec4b 1y ago
No need to be vile, I hope you are ok.
108.
by nec4b 1y ago
Where am I saying that?
109.
by nec4b 1y ago
So, no then, if it would hurt you, but you are fine hurting others for your goals.
110.
by nec4b 1y ago
If they don't change something drastically this is exactly what will happen according to science. It's like there is a comet on course with Earth, but you are saying, knowing it would be meaningless because something might change
111.
by nec4b 1y ago
I don't know about you, but for me my mind is my wealth. For an athlete their body is and so on. This is the basis for building all additional wealth.
112.
by nec4b 1y ago
How exactly can you change wealth? Would you lobotomize more intelligent people, perhaps knee cap athletes, break fingers of musicians?
113.
by nec4b 1y ago
>> It is not impossible. It is going to happen and it is unavoidable. Based on history it hasn't happened. How do you know it's going to? >>The alternative is to keep pushing for an ever growing population and to end u
114.
by nec4b 1y ago
I don't know what point are trying to make, beside being sarcastic. Knowing that each succeeding generation will be a 1/3 of the previous one has huge influence on how to prepare a society to function when population pyramid will
115.
by nec4b 1y ago
>> Extrapolations over a century into the future are worthless. Its just math showing the trend and it's not worthless as it should give you something to think about. >> We need to embrace and adapt to a decrease in populat
116.
by nec4b 1y ago
The other side says something similar. Violence on "not my race" is justified, because they are subhumans.
117.
by nec4b 1y ago
Yes, it has happen that some people have given away all their property and secluded themselves. I'm afraid to ask what is the point of your question. You surely don't think everyone will give up their wealth to the avant-garde and
118.
by nec4b 1y ago
And how can you achieve a classless society without violence?
119.
by nec4b 1y ago
Not true, Catholic priests still have private property. But sure there are other religions that have this. It's voluntary and the percentage of people doing this is tiny.
120.
by nec4b 1y ago
Of course, how else can you achieve classless society. Do you expect people to freely give everything they have to the state, so it can redistribute their wealth around? Don't you know the concept of a class enemy and why so much of ma

More ›