neatze

27 ms·

1. 301.▲
   by neatze 5y ago

   I meant in terms of emergency services response in general and transport/care from incident to hospital. I can't speak much about care in hospitals. But initial response to COVID was substantially worse in US then in Europe, in my
2. 302.▲
   by neatze 5y ago

   Europe is light years ahead in medical emergency services, when compared to US, this my limited observation, I am EMT volunteer in US.
3. 303.▲
   Project CETI (Cetacean Translation Initiative)(projectceti.org)

   2 points by neatze 5y ago|0 comments
4. 304.▲
   by neatze 5y ago

   Hopefully you see this, Department response to the Linux Foundation[0], does not matter how I look at it, it does not makes sense to, because deceit requires investigator(s) to participate in the activities being observed[1]. [0] https:&#x
5. 305.▲
   University of Minnesota Department Response to the Linux Foundation(drive.google.com)

   3 points by neatze 5y ago|0 comments
6. 306.▲
   A Full Disclosure of the Case Study of the “HypocriteCommits” Paper [pdf](www-users.cs.umn.edu)

   5 points by neatze 5y ago|0 comments
7. 307.▲
   The Linux Kernel as a Case Study on Rapid Development for Complex Software(thenewstack.io)

   1 points by neatze 5y ago|0 comments
8. 308.▲
   by neatze 5y ago

   At least on wallstreet, early on I noticed, sometimes people simply lose awareness (social interaction play's critical role) and end up doing illegal things, without knowing it, some end up in jail. I think if person ends up in amoral&
9. 309.▲
   Qt Licensing Explained [pdf](cdn2.hubspot.net)

   1 points by neatze 5y ago|0 comments
10. 310.▲
    Ethical Conduct in Cybersecurity Research and “hypocrite commits”(davisjam.medium.com)

    3 points by neatze 5y ago|0 comments
11. 311.▲
    by neatze 5y ago

    It is not just bad researchers behavior, it not just unprofessional, it is unacceptable in scientific community, this is an fact, this is where most of outrage is coming from, but at same time similar unethical behavior is legal to a degree
12. 312.▲
    by neatze 5y ago

    How does FMC compare to SysML?
13. 313.▲
    by neatze 5y ago

    Why do you think there will be any change in behavior ? It is not like community members are not for look out for bad commits on every new commit from most committers any way, since at least 2003, I think substantially earlier.
14. 314.▲
    by neatze 5y ago

    I fail to understand how such work should not mention neuro evolutionary argument typologies (NEAT). Does there's work substantially different then NEAT ? How does there's work compares in performance to NEAT ?
15. 315.▲
    Sokal Affair(en.wikipedia.org)

    4 points by neatze 5y ago|1 comments
16. 316.▲
    by neatze 5y ago

    Out of curiosity, study where humans are deceived about the fact that they are research subjects can be justified in general ? (to me seems like correct answer no) Some relevant cases; the Facebook case[0] suggests it is justified because o
17. 317.▲
    by neatze 5y ago

    Context who does what actions is important, you seem to equate university "professionals" research actions to volunteer community actions, it is false to large degree, like comparing apples to orangeries, additionally, consent to
18. 318.▲
    by neatze 5y ago

    My biggest point of confusion from article is that regulation(s) do not require explicit consent from human subjects on use of there's time, irrespective of what information is collected.
19. 319.▲
    by neatze 5y ago

    Thank you for such detailed response. Can there be ethical possibility (highly remote one) where an study (assuming it is objectively justified) conducted with deception, but without prior informed consent at all. (eg. human subjects will n
20. 320.▲
    by neatze 5y ago

    What are your thoughts about this article[0], my reading or article is that; author fails in similar way (to some extent) as researchers and there's IRB in regards to ethics of such research. [0] https://dave-dittrich.medium
21. 321.▲
    by neatze 5y ago

    In researcher's shoes, I would retract paper from IEEE, only then send open latter. Because they did not do this, does not looks like there's open letter is sincere, I am sure researcher's aware that there where multiple comp
22. 322.▲
    by neatze 5y ago

    This paper had multiple issues that they where aware of before the ban, original ban email indicates that complaint was made before to there's university, on twitter feed one of the researchers stated that IEEE received also complaint
23. 323.▲
    by neatze 5y ago

    Additionally, would be right thing to do with there's apology email to also state that they retracted "hypocrite commit” paper from IEEE ? After all before a ban, there where complaint(s) made regarding this paper, by other resear
24. 324.▲
    by neatze 5y ago

    I am skeptical if they are sincere, because they did not retracted IEEE paper.
25. 325.▲
    by neatze 5y ago

    But you have a choice to interact with community or not to interact with an community, difference is that researcher's of “hypocrite commit” did not give such choice to community members, as of today there is overwhelming indication th
26. 326.▲
    by neatze 5y ago

    We are sorry, but we are going ahead and present our paper on IEEE ? Since when it is a ok to acquire data through unethical means and then publish it in a journal ?
27. 327.▲
    by neatze 5y ago

    > As many observers have pointed out to us, we made a mistake by not finding a way to consult with the community and obtain permission before running this study; we did that because we knew we could not ask the maintainers of Linux for p
28. 328.▲
    OpenAI-Powered Linux Shell Uses AI to Do What You Mean(riveducha.onfabrica.com)

    3 points by neatze 5y ago|0 comments
29. 329.▲
    Creating, Destroying, and Restoring Value in Wikipedia [pdf](reidster.net)

    1 points by neatze 5y ago|0 comments
30. 330.▲
    Security Research Ethics Review(dave-dittrich.medium.com)

    1 points by neatze 5y ago|0 comments