Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
nearbuy
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
30 ms
·
391.
▲
by
nearbuy
4y ago
As far as I can tell, this is an unsourced statistic, and something that wouldn't be that easy to measure or even define. What counts as time spent together?
392.
▲
by
nearbuy
4y ago
Sorry, you're right. I feel bad. You wouldn't be able to claim independent creation though by reproducing a work with Copilot.
393.
▲
by
nearbuy
4y ago
They are only using material for which they have a license (at least debatably). Open source software licenses usually require attribution if you reproduce the source code or use the source code in a program. Some other uses are allowed wit
394.
▲
by
nearbuy
4y ago
That's not what's happening here. Copyright work remains copyrighted regardless of how you produced it. If you lived in a secluded cave and completely independently wrote Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone (unlikely, I kno
395.
▲
by
nearbuy
4y ago
Yeah, degree generally matters. Airplane flights rarely kill people, so we allow them. If 50% of flights resulted in death, we would not. Google searches rarely illegally return copyrighted content, so it's allowed. The Pirate Bay sear
396.
▲
by
nearbuy
4y ago
Or that the professor has a legitimate concern, and a lot of people in the comments here don't have any code being stolen and are just afraid of Copilot. It can be both things. (I'm not endorsing either view, just trying to clarif
397.
▲
by
nearbuy
4y ago
I interpreted it as them saying only a tiny, tiny fraction of Copilot completions violate copyright.
398.
▲
by
nearbuy
4y ago
OP said they don't care that it can reproduce copyrighted content because they're not going to do so with it. That's roughly the opposite of what you're implying.
399.
▲
by
nearbuy
4y ago
What makes these models feel so impressive is that they don't just copy their training sets. They pick up on concepts and principles.
400.
▲
by
nearbuy
4y ago
DALL-E image of Mickey Mouse: https://openart.ai/discovery/generation-arxwmypmw7v5zpxeik1y...
401.
▲
by
nearbuy
4y ago
Your point boils down to privacy is good because it lets people get away with crime and laws might be bad. The solution shouldn't be to make crimes easier to hide. It's to legalize homosexuality.
402.
▲
by
nearbuy
4y ago
If you're innocent, more information about what happened is more likely to exonerate you than incriminate you. If you're guilty, the extra data is more likely to incriminate you.
403.
▲
by
nearbuy
4y ago
A human artist can freely paint something in the style of another artist. It's not considered a derivative work. You can't copyright a style. A derivative work is an adaptation, translation, or modification of a particular, existi
404.
▲
by
nearbuy
4y ago
> If my browser is funneling all of its traffic through a specific VPN instead of letting my system handle it It's not. According to the article, it only funnels insecure traffic through the Cloudflare VPN (eg, to a site with an inv
405.
▲
by
nearbuy
4y ago
> obvious privacy downsides What is the obvious privacy downside of selectively enabling a Cloudflare VPN when browsing on public Wifi or unsecured sites (which is when it enables)? That Cloudflare can see what sites you visit? On public
406.
▲
by
nearbuy
4y ago
But if they do that, you can just continue playing on your own PC.
407.
▲
by
nearbuy
4y ago
Ironically, your comment also sounds arrogant and condescending. The AI safety crowd's main concern isn't that an "unaligned" superintelligence will have some other people's values. It's that an unaligned AI mi
408.
▲
by
nearbuy
4y ago
100% efficiency is obviously an impossibly high bar for anyone. > I suspect that distributing the money to Microsoft employees would noticeably drop the total dollar amount devoted to charity, and exponentially increase the number of cha
409.
▲
by
nearbuy
4y ago
It worked out for the better in the end, considering Gates has pledged to give 99% of his wealth to charity. To redistribute that wealth to among Microsoft employees would essentially be taking money from the poorest 10% of people and givin
410.
▲
by
nearbuy
4y ago
Spot checking for important projects is a good way of making sure those other 4 hierarchy levels are doing their job well.
411.
▲
by
nearbuy
4y ago
Only if they defrauded one of the most effective charities (as opposed to $4500 raised to buy some new musical instruments for a school) and only if punishments should be determined by total harm caused. Harm caused is usually one of severa
412.
▲
by
nearbuy
4y ago
They're accused of making employees feel "uncomfortable, intimidated and bullied". Without knowing the details of the situation, I'm not sure we can confidently know whether these employees were being jerks or management
413.
▲
by
nearbuy
4y ago
> This isn't concerning. Did you read past the title? It's not supposed to be concerning. > The world produces more food than ever, but the amount of land we use is now falling. This means we can feed more people while resto
414.
▲
by
nearbuy
4y ago
I don't think so. You can set the search options to only find images published before the article, and even find some of the original images. One image links to the 2015 article, "It's Ridiculous To Say Black Women's Nat
415.
▲
by
nearbuy
4y ago
That's exactly what's happening. Doing the search from the article of "unprofessional hair for work" brings up images with headlines like "It's ridiculous to say that black women's hair is unprofessional&q
416.
▲
by
nearbuy
4y ago
I don't think we'd want the model to reflect the global statistics. We'd usually want it to reflect our own culture by default, unless it had contextual clues to do something else. For example, the most eaten foods globally a
417.
▲
by
nearbuy
4y ago
I'm not sure it was profitable. The article suggests they duped 4.4 million Americans. They would likely still have made at least a little money off those people if their marketing was honest. There's reputational damage too. Hope
418.
▲
by
nearbuy
5y ago
But what did the other students the class do? If almost everyone in the class did only one, the professor would have to give almost the entire class 33% for a mistake he made.
419.
▲
by
nearbuy
5y ago
I think you're misinterpreting the parent comment. By "gaming the system" and "tragedy of the commons" they mean that features they release to help can hurt the drivers and the passengers. Tragedy of the commons is
420.
▲
by
nearbuy
5y ago
Okay, I see your point about hostile states, and I appreciate the respectful debate. I'm not so sure about AI safety research myself, because it's very hard to evaluate how effective it is (I guess if an AI ever wipes us out, we&#
More ›