ndnjjfhshhvjj

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by ndnjjfhshhvjj 9y ago

   The overarching term ist cultic, I believe.
2. 2.▲
   by ndnjjfhshhvjj 9y ago

   > one-to-one and onto funktion I don't think that's the established terminology. > How do you propose to interpret all of these groups geometrically, How do you not? This pure maths wank really grinds my gears. Of course you
3. 3.▲
   by ndnjjfhshhvjj 9y ago

   I'm not sure I unterstand. Are you saying addition was not a natural transformation, in contrast to shifting? I do have a Problem reasoning about binarry addition in terms of shift operations, but in the simplest case, a modulo 2 ring