ndhlms

3 ms·

1.
by ndhlms 4y ago
"Ask for a fix" is euphemism what often happens. It's commonplace to receive reports to the tune of: * "Can we get an ETA on this? Some of us need to get real work done" * "How you can justify leaving out
2.
by ndhlms 4y ago
Or using the same the account name on multiple sites, u/LtWorf ;)
3.
by ndhlms 4y ago
Basically the assumption that by sharing your work, you become inherently beholden to the wishes of those that use your work. Some time over the last ten years or so, much of the open source community acquired the belief that they deserve t
4.
by ndhlms 4y ago
All that does is associate an arbitrary SSH key with a GitHub account. There is still no reliable way to verify the identity of the GitHub account owner, or the SSH key that account holder generated. How does that expose any more informatio
5.
by ndhlms 4y ago
I don't see that any of those reasons are relevant, in all honesty. 1. This is not even a moderate ask; using ssh for git transactions is no more or less burdensome than https 2. As has been pointed out, there is no reason or reliable
6.
by ndhlms 4y ago
The problem is you're still failing to demonstrate a causal link between threats of legal action and GNOME3 or Unity. I was around during this time and early adopter of GNOME Shell (i.e. 2.31.x); there was and is zero evidence indicati
7.
by ndhlms 4y ago
It's a shame that none of these "critical" reviews actually contain any well-researched criticism. Confusing the wider shadow radius on windows with the bounds of the screenshot utility? Referring to Mobian as a for-profit co