Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ncodes
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
ncodes
6y ago
I think most people prefer tools that are convenient to use. Centralized code hosting services are super convenient. They offer many useful social features that make it tasking and unappealing to use git as intended. Even with tools like Gi
2.
▲
MakeOS: Decentralizing git hosting with a DHT and DLT
(makeos.org)
1 points
by
ncodes
6y ago
|
3 comments
3.
▲
by
ncodes
9y ago
> So I just withdraw my funds take photos of them, "upload" them. Go back to my bank, exchange the bills and repeat? Yes. Anyone else who gets hold of those bills you used and exchanged with your bank will find them "burne
4.
▲
by
ncodes
9y ago
> So I take a picture of a $100 U.S dollar, send it to your contract app, and I will get quant tokens? Which quant tokens are a cryptocurrency that I can sell on a exchange? Yes. You take a photo of your any supported banknote and you ge
5.
▲
by
ncodes
9y ago
> What you are not understanding is that a smart contract is a protocol amongst people. You don't code it anywhere in the blockchain directly. It a a protocol that explains how, if each party runs code independently, assuming everyo
6.
▲
by
ncodes
9y ago
Thank you so much for your kind words and advice. It means a lot to me. I will definitely remember these words as I build on and receive feedback :-)
7.
▲
by
ncodes
9y ago
> "Ellcrys" is a word that is likely subject to trademark and owned by Del Rey. umm, I will be looking into this. Thanks for the heads up. I understand that there is a lot of debate about what a smart contract is, its legal sco
8.
▲
by
ncodes
9y ago
> Surprisingly, there is code backing this crazy idea Yes! and it works really well too :)
9.
▲
by
ncodes
9y ago
> ummm... huh ? This is a Shannara reference Yes, it is :D
10.
▲
by
ncodes
9y ago
I respectfully disagree. You do not need a decentralized, social protocol to build a smart contract or self-executing application platform. A smart contract is simply an agreement between parties, written in codes and enforced by a third-pa
11.
▲
by
ncodes
9y ago
This issue has been fixed. Please take a look again. Thank you :-)
12.
▲
by
ncodes
9y ago
I knew the "no gimmick" phrase will be subjective :-D > And I still can't think of a single use case If you and a several persons are in need of a platform to build any kind of cloud-based application but also do not wish
13.
▲
by
ncodes
9y ago
Exactly. As much as we believe decentralization will remove the middleman, we need to understand that not every application can be built on decentralized systems. Our goal is to provide a platform where communities/teams can build simp
14.
▲
by
ncodes
9y ago
I'm so sorry about this. I will take a look and fix it.
15.
▲
by
ncodes
9y ago
> I'm not sure a quantum mechanical metaphor is the best way to describe your service The service is not actually being described in the context of quantum mechanics. The native currency borrows some ideas from this paper ( https:&#
16.
▲
by
ncodes
9y ago
> I can't tell if this is serious or not (admittedly without reading the white-paper) This is a serious thing. Please take a look at the whitepaper. Your feedback will be greatly appreciated. > A reference to 'tokenized quan
17.
▲
Show HN: Building a no gimmick smart contract platform as a service
(ellcrys.co)
45 points
by
ncodes
9y ago
|
31 comments
18.
▲
by
ncodes
10y ago
I do not think there is need to encrypt the data as the JWT signature ensures the content cannot be altered successfully. You will need the private key to successfully alter the token. Also, the tokens shouldn't contain private informa
19.
▲
Ask HN: JWT as a Currency?
2 points
by
ncodes
10y ago
|
2 comments
20.
▲
by
ncodes
10y ago
I am not exactly avoiding the blockchain. There isn't any production ready database that I am aware of that provides immutability like the blockchain and an advanced querying system like NoSQL database systems. I looked at BlockchainDB
21.
▲
by
ncodes
10y ago
Justified paranoia :)
22.
▲
by
ncodes
10y ago
IPFS looks quite interesting. I will study it more to see whether it would play an important part in solving my problem. It appears there isn't an exact open source solution out there.
23.
▲
by
ncodes
10y ago
Thanks for your suggestion. The fact that data written to BigQuery can still be modified is not so great for my case. I want to be able to make data immutable forever. Nobody should be able to modify or delete it. Malicious alterations sho
24.
▲
by
ncodes
10y ago
Actually, I want no admin. Maybe this might sound a little crazy, I am trying to build a system where arbitrary number of persons maintain nodes (I don't even need to know these persons) that have my data. The software managing my data
25.
▲
by
ncodes
10y ago
The distributed databases I have looked into have a user who grants roles/access to every other user. This means someone has to be trusted with full privileges. A solution where the access/role is baked into the software could be
26.
▲
Ask HN: Is there an immutable and decentralized database out there?
5 points
by
ncodes
10y ago
|
14 comments
27.
▲
Show HN: Stone – A Cryptography Object for Future Digital Currency Platforms
(stonedoc.org)
3 points
by
ncodes
11y ago
|
0 comments
28.
▲
Show HN: Stone – Cryptography Asset for Private Digital Currency Platforms
6 points
by
ncodes
11y ago
|
0 comments
29.
▲
by
ncodes
11y ago
This is a great. Finally, early stage ideas can get some support. Good one YC.